Liquid crystal display panel with multi-domain unit pixels and an optical mask for manufacturing the same

ABSTRACT

A liquid crystal display panel, including a unit pixel including a first substrate having a first alignment film, a second substrate having a second alignment film spaced apart from and facing the first alignment film, and a liquid crystal layer interposed between the first alignment film and the second alignment film; and first and second adjacent domains, each of which includes a domain boundary region defining part of an area between the adjacent domains, and a normal-luminance region adjacent to the domain boundary region, wherein pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules near the first alignment film in the domain boundary regions are greater than pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules near the first alignment film in the normal-luminance regions.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/005,700filed on Jan. 13, 2011 which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) toa Korean Patent Application filed in the Korean Intellectual PropertyOffice on Jul. 30, 2010 and assigned Serial No. 10-2010-0074249 and aKorean Patent Application filed in the Korean Intellectual PropertyOffice on Dec. 30, 2010 and assigned Serial No. 10-2010-0139663, thedisclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in theirentireties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Technical Field

The present invention relates to a liquid crystal display panel withmulti-domain unit pixels and an optical mask for manufacturing theliquid crystal display panel in a photo-alignment process.

2. Discussion of the Related Art

A liquid crystal display module includes a liquid crystal display panel,on which images are displayed by changing an arrangement of liquidcrystal molecules in a liquid crystal layer according to an electricalfield generated in the liquid crystal layer, a backlight assembly forproviding light to the liquid crystal display panel, and a case in whichthe liquid crystal display panel and the backlight assembly are fixed.

A liquid crystal display panel includes the liquid crystal layer, a pairof substrates with the liquid crystal layer interposed therebetween, anda pair of polarizers attached to the exteriors of the substrates. It isdesirable for an image displayed on a liquid crystal display panel tohave the same display quality no matter which direction it is viewed. Tothis end, many attempts have been made. For example, a VerticalAlignment (VA) mode liquid crystal display, which uses verticality ofliquid crystal molecules with respect to a substrate, and a Plane toLine Switching (PLS) mode liquid crystal display, which useshorizontality of liquid crystal molecules with respect to a substratehave been developed. Because the liquid crystal molecules of thesedisplays have similar refractive-index anisotropy characteristics indifferent directions, VA and PLS mode liquid crystal displays have awide viewing angle.

For more improved viewing angle characteristics, patterns of metalwires, slits or projections made of an organic film are formed on unitpixels so that liquid crystal molecules may have a similar slope indifferent directions. However, since liquid crystal molecules areaffected by a fringe field, the patterns, the slits or the projectionsmay reduce an aperture ratio, which is a ratio of the region where thelight provided from a backlight assembly passes through a unit pixel tothe total area of the unit pixel. The term ‘unit pixel’ as used hereinmay refer to a pixel representing the basic colors of a liquid crystaldisplay panel.

Liquid crystal molecules should always maintain the same arrangementwith respect to the same potential. To this end, a pretilt is formed inan alignment film on a substrate to fix a direction and a slope ofliquid crystal molecules located near the substrate. The pretilt of analignment film is formed by physically rubbing a rubbing cloth on analignment material previously formed on the substrate. However, themethod of using the rubbing cloth may reduce the yield of liquid crystaldisplay panels since a foreign substance may be introduced or staticelectricity may occur on the alignment layer due to the contact. Inaddition, rubbing cloths are frequently replaced, causing an increase inprocess time and cost.

To improve yield of a liquid crystal panel, a photo-alignment processhas been introduced. The photo-alignment process forms a pretilt of analignment film using a non-contact method without forming patterns,slits or projections in a pixel region. The photo-alignment processincludes applying a photo-reactive material onto a substrate andobliquely irradiating ultraviolet (UV) light to the surface on which thephoto-reactive material is applied. A pretilt of an alignment film isformed according to the direction of the irradiation. Accordingly,liquid crystal molecules may be tilted in several different directionsby dividing a unit pixel into several regions and irradiating lightthereto in different directions.

For example, a unit pixel may be divided in horizontal and verticaldirections to have four domains. Liquid crystal molecules are tilted indifferent directions according to the domains. However, liquid crystalmolecules located at boundary parts between neighboring or adjacentdomains may not be tilted to correspond to a voltage applied to thepixel. As a result, these liquid crystal molecules may block light,forming a Domain Boundary Texture (DBT) where a normal luminance doesnot appear in the domain. In other words, the DBT is a dark part or ashadow of a unit pixel, and distinguishes domains whose liquid crystalmolecules are tilted in different directions.

A unit pixel has a pixel electrode formed on one substrate, a commonelectrode formed on another transparent substrate spaced apart from thesubstrate of the pixel electrode, and a liquid crystal layer interposedbetween the two substrates. The pixel electrode is formed on each of aplurality of unit pixels arranged on one substrate while the commonelectrode is formed on the entire surface of another substrate, causinga fringe field to be formed between the edge of the pixel electrode andthe common electrode. Liquid crystal molecules, which are influenced bythe fringe field, are independently arranged without being affected by apixel potential, and block the light provided from the backlightassembly, forming a Fringe Field Texture (TFT) where the normalluminance does not appear in the domain.

Directions of pretilts of respective domains are matched to polarizationaxes of polarizers attached to substrates of a liquid crystal displaypanel. Since the pretilts of the respective domains are substantiallyperpendicular to at least one polarization axis, the light which haspassed through liquid crystal molecules near the DBTs or the edge of thepixel electrode is not perpendicular to the polarization axes of thepolarizers. As a result, the luminance may be locally reduced in theDBTs or in vicinity of the edges of the domains.

An aperture ratio of a unit pixel is calculated by dividing an area ofthe unit pixel having the normal luminance by the total area of the unitpixel. A light transmittance of a unit pixel is calculated by dividing aluminance at which light has penetrated the unit pixel by a luminance ofthe backlight assembly before light penetrates the unit pixel. Both theDBT and the FFT lead to a reduction in the luminance of unit pixels,causing a decrease in the aperture ratio and the light transmittance ofthe multi-domain unit pixels.

In the photo-alignment process, an angle of a pretilt, or a pretiltangle, is determined according to the intensity of the irradiated lightand/or the irradiation time. If the pretilt angle is excessively large,the molecules farther from the alignment film may be falsely arrangednot to agree with the potential applied to the pixel electrode. As aresult, unit pixels may show a luminance higher or lower than the normalluminance, reducing a contrast ratio of the liquid crystal display paneland causing a black afterimage phenomenon in which a gray color appearsin the unit pixel when a signal representing a black image is providedto a pixel electrode.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a liquid crystaldisplay panel with a unit pixel having reduced area Domain BoundaryTextures (DBTs) and Fringe Field Textures (FFTs), and a method formanufacturing the same.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a liquid crystaldisplay panel with a unit pixel having an improved aperture ratio andlight transmittance, and a method for manufacturing the same.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention provide a liquid crystaldisplay panel capable of preventing a black afterimage phenomenon, and amethod for manufacturing the same.

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention improve the displayquality of a liquid crystal display panel through combinations ofpretilts of alignment films and polarization axes of polarizers.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, aliquid crystal display panel has a unit pixel. The unit pixel includes afirst substrate having a first alignment film, a second substrate havinga second alignment film spaced apart from and facing the first alignmentfilm, and a liquid crystal layer interposed between the first alignmentfilm and the second alignment film. In addition, the unit pixel hasfirst and second adjacent domains, each of which includes a domainboundary region defining part of an area between the adjacent domains,and a normal-luminance region adjacent to the domain boundary region.Pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules near the first alignment filmin the domain boundary regions are greater than pretilt angles of liquidcrystal molecules near the first alignment film in the normal-luminanceregions, or pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules near the secondalignment film in the domain boundary regions are greater than pretiltangles of liquid crystal molecules near the second alignment film in thenormal luminance regions.

Each of the domain boundary regions is greater than about 5.0 μm wide.

Pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules in the domain boundaryregions are greater than about 1.8°, and the pretilt angles of liquidcrystal molecules in the normal-luminance regions are less than thepretilt angles of the liquid crystal molecules in the domain boundaryregions by about 0.2° or more.

Pretilt angles of liquid crystal molecules in at least one of the domainboundary regions increase as the domain boundary region extends from aside of the domain boundary region adjacent to the normal-luminanceregion toward another side of the domain boundary region.

DBTs are formed in each of the domain boundary regions, and a sum ofwidths of the domain boundary regions between adjacent domains isgreater than a sum of widths of the DBTs between the adjacent domains.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, aliquid crystal display panel includes a unit pixel. The unit pixel has afirst alignment film formed on a first substrate and a second alignmentfilm formed on a second substrate and facing the first alignment film.The unit pixel has a plurality of adjacent domains each having anormal-luminance region and domain boundary regions each domain boundaryregion defining part of an area between the adjacent domains. Amagnitude of a normal-luminance region alignment vector, which isobtained by adding an alignment vector of the first alignment film in anormal-luminance region to an alignment vector of the second alignmentfilm, is less than a magnitude of a domain boundary region alignmentvector, which is obtained by adding an alignment vector of the firstalignment film in a domain boundary region adjacent to thenormal-luminance region to the alignment vector of the second alignmentfilm.

The second alignment film has a first alignment vector and a secondalignment vector, which face opposite directions, and the firstalignment film has a third alignment vector and a fourth alignmentvector, which are perpendicular to the first alignment vector and thesecond alignment vector, and face opposite directions, respectively. Theunit pixel has four different normal-luminance region alignment vectorsdetermined from the first to fourth alignment vectors.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, onesubstrate of two substrates of a unit pixel may have alignment vectorswhose number is the same as the number of domains of the unit pixel,while the other substrate does not have an alignment vector. The liquidcrystal display panel further includes a first polarizer and a secondpolarizer, the first and second polarizers having a first polarizationaxis and a second polarization axis, respectively, which cross thenormal-luminance region alignment vectors at an angle of about 45°, andthe domain boundary regions each have a DBT region having liquid crystalmolecules arranged in parallel to the first polarization axis or thesecond polarization axis, and a luminance-improved region having liquidcrystal molecules crossing the first polarization axis or the secondpolarization axis.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, aliquid crystal display panel includes a unit pixel. The unit pixelincludes a pixel electrode formed on a first substrate, a wiring patternwhich is arranged around the pixel electrode on the first substrate andis an electrode including an opaque material, and a common electrodewhich is formed on the second substrate. In addition, the pixelelectrode has a projection in an edge region of the pixel electrode, inwhich an FFT is located, and the projection overlaps the wiring pattern.

The pixel electrode is substantially rectangular in shape, one side ofthe pixel electrode has the projection and a recess formed connectivelywith the projection, and the projection is greater than about 6 μm wide.

The wiring pattern includes a storage electrode partially overlapping anedge of the pixel electrode, and the projection overlaps the storageelectrode.

The wiring pattern includes a data line spaced apart from the pixelelectrode, and the projection overlaps the data line.

The wiring pattern of the unit pixel includes a storage electrodepartially overlapping the projection of the pixel electrode, and a dataline spaced apart from an edge of the pixel electrode, and the pixelelectrode has on one side thereof the projection and a recessconnectively formed with the projection. The data line and the storageelectrode of the unit pixel cross each other near a region where theprojection and the recess of the pixel electrode meet.

The second substrate further includes a black matrix for blocking lightincident upon a side of the second substrate opposite the side on whichthe common electrode is formed, and the black matrix covers theprojection of the pixel electrode, the storage electrode, and the dataline on the first substrate.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, amask includes a unit masking pattern for forming pretilt angles in aunit pixel of a liquid crystal display panel. The unit masking patternhas a substantially rectangular pattern, on which a non-irradiation partpattern, a domain boundary region pattern, and a normal-luminance regionpattern are disposed in sequence. The non-irradiation part pattern has afirst light blocking region, which is located on one side of the unitmasking pattern and completely blocks light. The normal-luminance regionpattern has a first light transmission region and a second lightblocking region, and has a normal-luminance region transmittance ratio,which is obtained by dividing an area of the first light transmissionregion by an area of the normal-luminance region pattern. The domainboundary region pattern has a second light transmission region and athird light blocking region, and has a domain boundary regiontransmittance ratio, which is obtained by dividing an area of the secondlight transmission region by an area of the domain boundary regionpattern. The transmittance ratio of the domain boundary region patternis greater than the transmittance ratio of the normal-luminance regionpattern.

The domain boundary region pattern has a first irradiation part and asecond irradiation part, which are adjacent to each other. The firstirradiation part is included in the second light transmission region andlight is transmitted through the entirety of the first irradiation part,and the second irradiation part is included in a third lighttransmission region, which includes the third light blocking region. Thefirst irradiation part is in contact with the non-irradiation partpattern, and the second irradiation part is in contact with thenormal-luminance region pattern. The third light blocking region of thesecond irradiation part has a light blocking length parallel to thenormal-luminance region pattern, and the light blocking length isshorter as the third light blocking region is farther away from thenormal-luminance region pattern.

The third light blocking region of the second irradiation part is anisosceles triangle having a bottom side abutting the normal-luminanceregion pattern.

The mask includes a plurality of the unit masking patterns repeatedlyarranged in adjacent lines and is configured to be moved in a directionperpendicular to a direction in which the unit masking patterns arerepeatedly arranged, such that the third light blocking region of thedomain boundary region pattern has a light blocking length in adirection parallel to a direction in which the mask moves, and the lightblocking length is longer as the third light blocking region is closerto the normal-luminance region pattern, and shorter as the third lightblocking region is closer to the first irradiation part.

The domain boundary region pattern is about 5 μm or more wide. Inaddition, the domain boundary region pattern may be about 8 μm or lesswide.

The transmittance ratio of the normal-luminance region pattern rangesfrom 25% to 35%.

The domain boundary region pattern is configured to provide first lightenergy over zero to a texture region of the unit pixel and thenormal-luminance region pattern is configured to provide second lightenergy over zero to a normal-luminance region of the unit pixel, whereinthe first and second light energies are different.

In accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, aliquid crystal display panel includes a unit pixel, the unit pixelincluding: a first domain, a second domain and a domain boundary regionbetween the first and second domains, wherein the domain boundary regionincludes a first domain boundary region as part of the first domain anda second domain boundary region as part of the second domain, the firstand second domain boundary regions are adjacent to each other, whereinthe first domain includes a normal-luminance region and the first domainboundary region includes a texture adjacent to the second domainboundary region and a luminance improved region adjacent to thenormal-luminance region, and wherein the normal-luminance region has aluminance greater than a luminance of the texture and the luminanceimproved region has a luminance between the luminances of thenormal-luminance region and the texture.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The above and other features of the present invention will become moreapparent by describing in detail exemplary embodiments thereof withreference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a partial cross section of a liquidcrystal display panel;

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a first substrate of a unit pixel included inthe liquid crystal display panel of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a plan view of a pixel electrode in the unit pixel of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a luminance graph obtained by measuring luminances of two unitpixels taken along line IV-IV′ of FIG. 3;

FIGS. 5A to 5D show exemplary images displayed by a liquid crystaldisplay panel when different pattern images are provided to the liquidcrystal display panel to which a photo-alignment process was applied;

FIGS. 6A and 6B are partial cross sections of a unit pixel, which showpretilt angles and alignment vectors in a domain boundary region and anormal-luminance region, according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 7A and 7B are, respectively, a plan view of a unit pixel withmultiple domains, which shows a Fringe Field Texture (FFT) occurring atthe edge of a pixel electrode, according to an exemplary embodiment ofthe present invention, and a cross sectional view of the unit pixelshowing a fringe field in the unit pixel and an arrangement of liquidcrystal molecules in the FFT taken along line VII(b)-VII(b)′ of FIG. 7A;

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a substrate and optical masks for a processof forming pretilt angles in unit pixels of a liquid crystal displaypanel by irradiating polarized ultraviolet (UV) light to the substratecoated with a photo-alignment material, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 9A and 9B are, respectively, a plan view of a unit maskingpattern, which is arranged on an optical mask, and on which a pattern isformed such that a domain boundary region of a unit pixel may have apretilt angle different from that of a normal-luminance region,according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, and agraph showing energies of light irradiated to a photo-alignmentsubstrate with respect to regions of the unit masking pattern of FIG.9A;

FIGS. 10A and 10B are, respectively, a plan view of a unit maskingpattern with a domain boundary region pattern divided into a pluralityof irradiation patterns, according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention, and a graph showing light energies with respect toregions of the unit masking pattern of FIG. 10A;

FIGS. 11A to 11E are plan views of unit masking patterns, which show anon-irradiation part pattern, a normal-luminance region pattern, and adomain boundary region pattern, each having various shapes, according toexemplary embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 12 is a graph showing a relationship between light transmittance ofa unit pixel and a ratio of energy of light irradiated to anormal-luminance region to energy of light irradiated to a domainboundary region of a unit pixel;

FIGS. 13A and 13B are, respectively, a table showing measurementcriteria for black afterimage indices of a liquid crystal display panelmanufactured by a photo-alignment process, and a graph showing arelationship between observed black afterimage values and energies ofthe light irradiated to a normal-luminance region of a unit pixel;

FIG. 14 is a graph showing a relationship between a width of a domainboundary region of a unit pixel and light transmittance of the unitpixel when light with different energies is irradiated to the domainboundary region and normal-luminance region of the unit pixel;

FIGS. 15A and 15B are, respectively, a plan view of a unit maskingpattern to which a domain boundary region pattern and second irradiationpattern having different widths are applicable, according to anexemplary embodiment of the present invention, and a graph showing arelationship between an area or width of the domain boundary regionpattern and second irradiation pattern of FIG. 15A and associated lighttransmittances of a unit pixel;

FIG. 16A is a plan view of a unit masking pattern to which a fringefield region pattern is applied to increase a pretilt angle at an edgeof a unit pixel, according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIGS. 16B to 16D are diagrams showing alignment vectors of a unit pixeland a local change in light transmittance of the unit pixel, caused bythe alignment vectors, when the unit masking pattern of FIG. 16A isapplied to first and second substrates of the unit pixel;

FIG. 17A is a plan view of a first substrate of a unit pixel in which aprojection is formed at the edge of a pixel electrode and an FFT isformed on the projection, according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention;

FIGS. 17B and 17C are, respectively, cross sectional views of the unitpixel of FIG. 17A taken along lines XVII(b)-XVII(b)′ andXVII(c)-XVII(c)′, which show examples in which the projection of thepixel electrode overlaps an FFT, a data line, and a black matrix;

FIG. 18 is a partial plan view of a unit pixel, showing a data line anda storage electrode of the unit pixel bent in accord with an externalshape of a pixel electrode and a black matrix extended straight,according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 19A is a plan view of a first substrate of a unit pixel withmultiple pixel electrodes having projections, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 19B and 19C are, respectively, plan views of a second substratehaving a black matrix, and the unit pixel made by assembling the firstsubstrate and the 20 second substrate of FIGS. 19A and 19B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described indetail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The presentinvention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and shouldnot be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein.

Like reference numerals may refer to the same elements, features and/orstructures in the drawings and the following description. To betterunderstand exemplary embodiments of the present invention, a briefdescription of a prior art liquid crystal display panel will be madewith reference to FIGS. 1 to 3. FIG. 1 is a perspective view of apartial cross section of a liquid crystal display panel, which shows acombination of a liquid crystal layer and substrates having polarizersand alignment films. Referring to FIG. 1, a liquid crystal display panel10 has a first substrate 100, a second substrate 200, and a liquidcrystal layer 300 interposed therebetween.

The first substrate 100 has a first polarizer 120, a first basesubstrate (or underlying substrate) 110, and a first alignment film 130,which are stacked in sequence. The first base substrate 110 is made of atransparent material, and can pass the light irradiated from a backlightassembly (not shown). The first polarizer 120 receives the light fromthe backlight assembly, which has various polarization components, andpasses only some polarization components toward the liquid crystal layer300. As shown in FIG. 1, the first polarizer 120 is manufactured in theform of a thin film and attached to the outer surface of the first basesubstrate 110, which faces the backlight assembly. In the alternative,the first polarizer 120 may be applied onto the inner surface of thefirst base substrate 110, which faces the liquid crystal layer 300.

The first alignment film 130 is made of a polymer material, and itssurface is physically bonded with liquid crystal molecules. Thisphysical assembly is used to adjust a pretilt of the liquid crystalmolecules. To be specific, the pretilt means that the liquid crystalmolecules near the alignment film are tilted in a specific directionwith respect to the surface of the alignment film. A pretilt angle mayrefer to an angle at which the pretilt is made with respect to eitherthe surface or perpendicular to the surface of the alignment film. Thepretilt and the pretilt angle are constant regardless of the pixelvoltage applied to unit pixels of a liquid crystal display panel, andinduce other nearby liquid crystal molecules to be arranged in aspecific direction according to the pixel voltage. Although the pretiltand the pretilt angle have been described as characteristics of liquidcrystal molecules near an alignment film, it will be understood by thoseof ordinary skill in the art that since the pretilt and the pretiltangle are determined based on the material and structure of thealignment film, they become characteristics of an alignment film of aunit pixel.

A pretilt is determined according to properties of liquid crystalmolecules in a liquid crystal layer. For example, if liquid crystalmolecules are for a Vertical Alignment (VA) mode liquid crystal display,the pretilt is made in a specific direction that is perpendicular to adirection in which an alignment film is extended. In the alternative, ifliquid crystal molecules are for a Plane to Line Switching (PLS) modeliquid crystal display, the pretilt is made in a specific directionparallel to the surface of an alignment film. In another alternative, ifliquid crystal molecules are for a Twisted Nematic (TN) mode liquidcrystal display, the pretilt is made at a specific angle with respect tothe surface of an alignment film.

The pretilt may be made by a photo-alignment process. Thephoto-alignment process includes applying an alignment film material toa base substrate, and inducing photopolymerization by obliquelyirradiating light such as specifically polarized ultraviolet (UV) raysto give the alignment layer a pretilt and a pretilt angle.

The second substrate 200 has a second polarizer 220, a second basesubstrate 210, and a second alignment film 230, which are stacked insequence. The basic properties of key elements of the second substrate200 are generally similar to those described in relation to the firstsubstrate 100. However, they may be different in the following aspects,but exemplary embodiments of the present invention are not limitedthereto.

The first substrate 100 may have several patterns made of a conductivematerial, such as gate lines, data lines and pixel electrodes. On theother hand, the second substrate 200 may have a common electrode and aplurality of color filters. In particular, each of the color filtersrepresents each of the basic colors, and constitutes a unit pixel bybeing combined with a pixel electrode on the first substrate 100. Thebasic colors may be the three primary colors of red, green and blue, orcyan, yellow and magenta. A unit pixel is a basic unit capable ofrepresenting various gray scales of a unit color, and for thisoperation, the color filter may be located together with the pixelelectrode on the first base substrate 110 rather than the second basesubstrate 210.

A common electrode (not shown) may be disposed on the second substrate200 of the liquid crystal display panel 10, which in this example is VAmode. The common electrode forms a pixel potential together with a pixelelectrode (not shown) on the first substrate 100, allowing a unit pixelto represent various gray scales. While differences between the secondsubstrate 200 and the first substrate 100 have been described so far, itwill be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that variousother differences may exist due to a change of the liquid crystal's modeto the PLS mode and a change of the liquid crystal display panel 10 to areflection type rather than the transmission type.

A direction of a polarization axis of the second polarizer 220 on thesecond substrate 200 is determined based on the polarization axis of thefirst polarizer 120 and the mode of the liquid crystal molecules. Forexample, in the case where liquid crystal molecules have the VA mode,since normally black is used to increase a contrast ratio, polarizationaxes of the first and second polarizers 120 and 220 are perpendicular toeach other. The term ‘normally black’ refers to the situation where whenno potential is applied to the liquid crystal display panel 10, thelight from the backlight assembly is completely blocked by the liquidcrystal display panel 10.

The polarizers 120 and 220 are attached to the base substrates 110 and210 such that their polarization axes are substantially parallel withthe sides of the substrates 100 and 200. The light radiated from thebacklight assembly passes through the first polarizer 120 in a linearlypolarized way. While passing through liquid crystal molecules, thelinearly polarized light is either converted into circularly polarizedlight or elliptically polarized light, or remains to be linearlypolarized light according to the arrangement of the liquid crystalmolecules. For example, if liquid crystal molecules are arrangedperpendicular to the substrates 100 and 200, the linearly polarizedlight, which has passed through the first polarizer 120, cannot passthrough the second polarizer 220 which has a polarization axisperpendicular to the first polarizer 120.

On the other hand, if liquid crystal molecules are arranged to be tiltedto the substrates 100 and 200, polarization components are convertedinto either circularly polarized components or elliptically polarizedcomponents because of the optical anisotropy of the liquid crystalmolecules. Therefore, the linearly polarized light, which has passedthrough the polarization axis of the first polarizer 120, can pass alongthe polarization axis of the second polarizer 220. However, the amountof the passing light is different according to the arrangement of liquidcrystal molecules. In particular, if liquid crystal molecules arearranged to cross the polarization axis of the first polarizer 120 at anangle of 45°, the light is linearly polarized while passing through thepolarization axis of the first polarizer 120, circularly polarized whilepassing through the liquid crystal molecules, and linearly polarizedagain while passing through the polarization axis of the secondpolarizer 220, thus ensuring the highest transmittance efficiency of thelight from the backlight assembly. However, as the angle between theliquid crystal molecules and the polarization axis gets farther from45°, the transmittance efficiency of the light gets lower.

The first and second substrates 100 and 200 have first and secondpretilt angles, respectively. Based on the pretilt angles, directionsand slopes of liquid crystal molecules adjacent to the first and secondalignment films 130 and 230 are determined. Since liquid crystalmolecules located in the middle of the liquid crystal layer 300 areaffected by the slope and direction of liquid crystal molecules adjacentto the alignment films 130 and 230, the arrangement of liquid crystalmolecules may be determined by the combination of the first and secondpretilt angles.

The pretilt angles can be represented as vectors having a direction anda magnitude. Therefore, controlling the arrangement of liquid crystalmolecules with the combination of the first and second pretilt angles isrepresented as a vector sum of the pretilt angles. Since a lighttransmittance efficiency of a liquid crystal display panel is highestwhen liquid crystal molecules cross the polarization axes of thepolarizers at an angle of 45°, a vector sum of the pretilt angles isdetermined such that the liquid crystal molecules cross the polarizationaxes at an angle of substantially 45°.

A unit pixel representing one basic color has a plurality of domains,each of which has a different vector sum of pretilt angles. Therefore,liquid crystal molecules of a unit pixel may be arranged in differentdirections, facilitating uniform radiation of light in differentdirections of the liquid crystal display panel 10.

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a first substrate of a unit pixel, which showsone of the unit pixels included in the liquid crystal display panel 10of FIG. 1 having a plurality of domains. Referring to FIG. 2, a unitpixel 400 has a gate line 410, a data line 420, a thin film transistor430 and a storage electrode 440 on a first base substrate, and is setsuch that a specific pixel voltage is applied to a pixel electrode 500.A voltage on the pixel electrode 500 forms a pixel potential togetherwith a common electrode (not shown) on the second substrate 200, andliquid crystal molecules of the unit pixel 400 vary in arrangementaccording to the pixel potential.

The unit pixel 400 in FIG. 2 has four domains, which have first tofourth domain alignment vectors 612, 622, 632 and 642, respectively.Each of the domain alignment vectors 612, 622, 632 and 642 is a sum ofan alignment vector of the first substrate 100, which has third andfourth alignment vectors 132 and 134 facing negative and positivedirections on the y-axis, and an alignment vector of the secondsubstrate 200, which has first and second alignment vectors 232 and 234facing negative and positive directions on the x-axis. Since the domainalignment vectors 612, 622, 632 and 642 are different from one anotherin this way, liquid crystal molecules in the unit pixel 400 face indifferent directions.

The unit pixel 400 has a specific aperture ratio. The aperture ratio isa ratio of an area of the unit pixel 400 where light from a backlightassembly passes to the total area of the unit pixel 400. In FIG. 2, anaperture ratio may be calculated by excluding areas of the wires 410,420, 430 and 440 made of an opaque material from the total area of theunit pixel 400. However, if a potential is applied to the unit pixel400, the area where light passes decreases due to the arrangement ofliquid crystal molecules, reducing the aperture ratio of the unit pixel400.

FIG. 3 is a plan view of a pixel electrode, which shows textures whereluminance decreases due to the arrangement of liquid crystal molecules,in the unit pixel 400 of FIG. 2. Referring to FIG. 3, a pixel electrode500 has a normal-luminance region 510 where a desired normal luminanceappears, and an abnormal-luminance region 520 where luminance is lowerthan the desired luminance. Liquid crystal molecules in thenormal-luminance region 510 are arranged to cross the polarization axesof the polarizers 120 and 220 formed on the first and second substrates100 and 200 at an angle of substantially 45°. On the other hand, liquidcrystal molecules in the abnormal-luminance region 520 are arranged notto cross the polarization axes of the polarizers 120 and 220 at an angleof 45°. As a result, in the abnormal-luminance region 520, a part of thelight does not pass along the polarization axes of the polarizers 120and 220, reducing the luminance. The abnormal-luminance region 520 isvisually identified in a unit pixel, and called a texture.

The abnormal-luminance region 520 is classified into two types: DomainBoundary Texture (DBT) and Fringe Field Texture (FFT), according to thecause.

First, the abnormal-luminance region 520 is a DBT(s) 522 occurring inthe boundary region between adjacent domains. The DBT 522 is aphenomenon where the luminance is decreased since liquid crystalmolecules are not arranged to cross the polarizing axes at an angle of45° since the domain alignment vectors are different between neighboringdomains. In addition, the DBT 522 is a name of the luminance-decreasedarea.

For example, in FIG. 3, an alignment vector 612 of a normal-luminanceregion 614 in a first domain 610 crosses first and second polarizationaxes 122 and 222 of a liquid crystal display panel, which are shownoutside the pixel electrode 500, at an angle of substantially 45°.Likewise, an alignment vector 622 of a normal-luminance region 624 in aneighboring second domain 620 crosses the first and second polarizationaxes 122 and 222 at an angle of substantially 45°. However, since liquidcrystal molecules in the boundary region between the two domains 610 and620 have an intermediate alignment with respect to the alignment vectors612 and 622 of the first and second domains 610 and 620, they are nearlyparallel with the polarization axes 122 and 222. Therefore, theluminance decreases, causing the occurrence of a texture.

The aforementioned DBT 522 is a domain vertical-boundary texture 523occurring in a vertical direction of the pixel electrode 500. Forsimilar reasons, the DBT 522 may also occur in a horizontal direction,and this is a domain horizontal-boundary texture 524 shown in FIG. 3.The DBTs 523 and 524 are luminance decreasing phenomena that take placebetween domains having different alignment vectors. A reduction in thesize of their areas can increase an aperture ratio of the unit pixel400.

Although in the foregoing description, the domains 610, 620, 630 and 640are distinguished by having different alignment vectors 612, 622, 632and 642, it may also be understood that the domains 610, 620, 630 and640 are distinguished by the DBTs 522. In other words, since allneighboring domains have different alignment vectors 612, 622, 632 and642, and the DBTs 522 also occur between the neighboring domains, thedomains can be described as both regions having different alignmentvectors and regions distinguished by DBTs. Accordingly, a specificdomain shown in FIG. 3 has a domain vertical-boundary texture 523, adomain horizontal-boundary texture 524, and a normal-luminance region510 between the textures 523 and 524.

Second, the abnormal-luminance region 520 is an FFT(s) 526 occurring atthe edge of the pixel electrode 500. A common electrode on the secondsubstrate 200 is formed on the entire surface of the second substrate200. On the other hand, pixel electrodes 500 on the first substrate 100are formed on individual unit pixels 400 to be separated fromneighboring pixel electrodes. As a result, a fringe field is formed atthe edge of the pixel electrode 500 of the unit pixel 400, and thefringe field has liquid crystal molecules uniformly tilted towards theinside of the pixel electrode 500 regardless of the pixel potential.Therefore, luminance at the part where the fringe field is formed islower than luminance at the inside of the pixel electrode 500, resultingin the occurrence of the FFT 526.

A decrease in area of the DBT 522 and the FFT 526 can improve anaperture ratio and a light transmittance efficiency of a unit pixel. Tobe specific, the areas of the textures 522 and 526 may be reduced byadjusting pretilt angles of alignment films and/or changing shapes ofwires and/or pixel electrodes.

Hereinafter, a detailed description of exemplary embodiments of thepresent invention will be made with reference to FIGS. 4 to 19C. FIG. 4is a luminance graph obtained by measuring luminances of two unit pixelshaving different pretilt angles along line IV-IV′ of FIG. 3. Referringto FIG. 4, it is noted that a DBT of a unit pixel having a largerpretilt angle is smaller in area.

To be specific, the horizontal axis of FIG. 4 represents a distance inmillimeters (mm), which goes away from the origin along the line IV-IV′,and its origin is the left FFT IV of the pixel electrode 500 in FIG. 3.The vertical axis represents luminance in cd/m². Since the DBT 522 canbe easier to distinguish from a higher luminance in the normal-luminanceregion 510, data of the graph in FIG. 4 represents luminances measuredby applying a gray scale value causing the unit pixels to emit light amaximum luminance. The luminances were measured using a ProMetricImaging Photometer and Colorimeter (Model No: PM1433F-1) manufactured byRadiant Imaging, Inc. at intervals of 0.48 μm. It should be noted thatthe unit pixels in FIG. 4 have a normally black mode and a VA mode,which are used as experimental conditions throughout the detaileddescription of the present invention.

The graph of FIG. 4 has two curves, ‘a’ and ‘b’. The curve ‘a’represents luminance data of a unit pixel in FIG. 3, of which the firstand second alignment films 130 and 230 have a pretilt angle of 1°, andthe curve ‘b’ represents luminance data of a unit pixel whose twoalignment films 130 and 230 have a pretilt angle of 3°.

The curve ‘a’ is divided into sections ‘i’ to ‘iii’ according to thechange in luminance. The section ‘i’ is a section from the origin to apoint where a DBT starts to appear, is a region where light passes in aunit pixel, and corresponds to a normal-luminance region. The section‘ii’ is a section where light does not pass in the unit pixel, andcorresponds to a DBT. Like the section ‘i’, the section ‘iii’ is aregion where light normally passes, and corresponds to anormal-luminance region.

The curve ‘b’ also shows the same pattern as that of the curve ‘a’, butis different from the curve ‘a’ in width of the sections. In particular,the section ‘ii’ DBT(a) of the curve ‘a’ is wider than the section ‘ii’DBT(b) of the curve ‘b’. To be specific, a width of the section ‘ii’ isa width of a wedge-shaped luminance curve at the luminance having avalue determined by subtracting a half of a difference between themaximum luminance and the minimum luminance of neighboring domains fromthe maximum luminance. For example, the maximum luminance of the curve‘a’ in FIG. 4 is 852.6 cd/cm² at 0.091 mm on the horizontal axis, andthe minimum luminance thereof is 456.9 cd/cm² at 0.067 mm on thehorizontal axis. Since a half of the value determined by subtracting theminimum luminance from the maximum luminance is 197.8 cd/cm², the widthof the section ‘ii’ is a distance of the horizontal axis at theluminance of 654.7 cd/cm² obtained by adding 197.8 cd/cm² to 456.9cd/cm². The width of the section ‘ii’ of the curve ‘a’, measured in thisway, is represented by DBT(a), and is about 0.011 mm. On the other hand,the width of the section ‘ii’ of the curve ‘b’ is represented by DBT(b),and is about 0.009 mm at 712.0 cd/m², which is narrower than the widthof the curve ‘a’.

As described above, the curve ‘a’ is for a unit pixel having a pretiltangle of 1°, while the curve ‘b’ is for a unit pixel having a pretiltangle of 3°. It can be seen that since the curve ‘b’ has a relativelynarrow DBT, an alignment film of a unit pixel, having a larger pretiltangle, has a smaller DBT area and can improve an aperture ratio.However, the large pretilt angle may deteriorate the display quality ofthe unit pixels and a liquid crystal display panel.

FIGS. 5A to 5D show exemplary images displayed by a liquid crystaldisplay panel when different pattern images are provided to the liquidcrystal display panel to which a photo-alignment process was applied. Itcan be seen from FIGS. 5A to 5D that in a liquid crystal display panelhaving a large pretilt angle, black images were not accuratelydisplayed. To find out whether a liquid crystal display panel normallydisplays all gray scales, the below-described pattern signals, in whichspecific luminance values are given in specific forms, are provided tothe liquid crystal display panel. By changing a gray scale valueprovided to a liquid crystal display panel after providing a patternsignal for a specific time, it is possible to determine whether theliquid crystal display panel normally operates.

FIG. 5A shows a no-pattern image 910, in which the maximum luminance isgiven on a liquid crystal display panel after a high-gray scale valuewas applied to the liquid crystal display panel without a test patternimage being applied. FIG. SB shows a test pattern image applied to theliquid crystal display panel. The test pattern image is applied in lightof the spatial distinction on the liquid crystal display panel to whichmaximum and minimum gray scales are given simultaneously, and a blackimage 920 and a white image 930 appear side by side. After beingmaintained for a predetermined time, e.g., 30 hours, the test pattern ischanged to another test pattern. FIG. 5C is a normal black image 940after a minimum gray scale value is given to the entire liquid crystaldisplay panel, after being changed from the gray scale value of FIG. 5B.

However, in some cases, normal luminance may not appear on the liquidcrystal display panel because of the improper arrangement of liquidcrystal molecules of the liquid crystal display panel. FIG. 5D is anabnormal image after a minimum gray scale value, which is changed fromthe gray scale value of FIG. 5B, is given to the entire liquid crystaldisplay panel. In FIG. 5D, a black afterimage phenomenon occurs to blackafterimage image 950, which corresponds to the part where a maximum grayscale value was applied previously in FIG. 5B, even though the minimumgray scale value is applied thereto.

The liquid crystal display panel used to represent the images of FIGS.5A to 5D had liquid crystal molecules of the normally black VA mode. Itwas determined that the black afterimage image 950 was caused by aphenomenon that happened because the liquid crystal molecules weretilted instead of being vertically arranged on the substrates of theliquid crystal display panel. It was also determined that, because theliquid crystal molecules were tilted, and because the alignment ofliquid crystal molecules near alignment films affects an arrangement ofliquid crystal molecules in the middle of a liquid crystal layer, theblack afterimage phenomenon might happen in a liquid crystal displaypanel of a large pretilt angle.

As can be understood from the description of FIGS. 4 and 5A to 5D, toreduce the DBTs 522 in the unit pixel 400, alignment films may have alarge pretilt angle. However, to reduce the black afterimage phenomenonby adjusting alignment of liquid crystal molecules in thenormal-luminance region 510, it may be helpful for alignment films tohave a small pretilt angle. In accordance with an exemplary embodimentof the present invention, there is provided a liquid crystal displaypanel that has a boundary region between the domains of the unit pixel400 having a pretilt angle larger than that of the normal-luminanceregion and that reduces a black afterimage phenomenon. To be specific, apretilt angle of the domain boundary region is greater than about 1.8°,and a pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region is less than thepretilt angle of the domain boundary region by about 0.2° or more.

Now, pretilt angles in a domain boundary region and a normal-luminanceregion will be described with reference to FIGS. 6A and 6B. FIG. 6A is apartial vertical cross section of a first domain, a second domain, and adomain boundary region between the first and second domains, which showsalignments of liquid crystal molecules in the domain boundary region anda normal-luminance region of a unit pixel according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention. It should be noted that the domainsin FIG. 6A are similar to those in the FIG. 3, except for the pretiltangles. For example, in FIG. 3 the pretilt angle of the domain boundaryregion is the same as the pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region,but in FIG. 6A according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention, the pretilt angle of the domain boundary region is differentfrom the pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region.

A pixel potential of a mid-gray scale value was applied to the unitpixel of FIG. 6A. Thus, while liquid crystal molecules ULC and LLC nearsubstrates 100 and 200 are aligned substantially perpendicular to thesubstrates 100 and 200, liquid crystal molecules MLC located in themiddle of a liquid crystal layer are arranged to be more tilted withrespect to a line perpendicular to the substrates 100 and 200 than theliquid crystal molecules ULC and LLC near the substrates 100 and 200.

Referring to FIG. 6A, a second alignment film 230 has a third alignmentvector 232 in both a first domain 610 and a second domain 620. On theother hand, a first alignment film 130 has a first alignment vector 132and a second alignment vector 134. The third alignment vector 232 headsfrom the right to the left, and causes the liquid crystal molecules ULCnear the second alignment film 230 to be tilted to the right.

The first alignment vector 132 has a direction of coming from the paperand causes the liquid crystal molecules LLC near the first alignmentfilm 130 to be tilted in a direction of entering into the paper. On theother hand, the second alignment vector 134 has a direction opposite tothat of the first alignment vector 132, and causes the liquid crystalmolecules LLC near the first alignment film 130 to be tilted in adirection of coming out from the paper. In FIG. 6A, to distinguishbetween the first and second alignment vectors 132 and 134, a length ofthe liquid crystal molecules having the first alignment vector 132 isshown shorter than a length of the liquid crystal molecules having thesecond alignment vector 134.

A domain alignment vector 612 of the first domain 610 is a sum of thethird and second alignment vectors 232 and 134, and liquid crystalmolecules in the first domain 610 are tilted to the left and come outfrom the paper. A domain alignment vector 622 of the second domain 620is a sum of the third and first alignment vectors 232 and 132, andliquid crystal molecules in the second domain 620 are tilted to the leftand enter into the paper.

The two alignment films 130 and 230 of a unit pixel according to anexemplary embodiment of the present invention have different pretiltangles in normal-luminance regions 614 and 624 and domain boundaryregions 616 and 626. Herein, for the pretilt angle, a directionperpendicular to the substrates 100 and 200 is defined as 0°, and anangle by which liquid crystal molecules are tilted with respect to thevertical direction is represented as the pretilt angle.

Referring to FIG. 6A, the pretilt angle of the first domain boundaryregion 616 of the first alignment film 130 is greater than the pretiltangle of the first normal-luminance region 614. The pretilt angles ofthe second alignment film 230 are the same in each of the domainboundary region 616 and the normal-luminance region 614. Therefore, analignment vector of the domain boundary region 616 is greater than analignment vector of the normal-luminance region 614. Like in the firstdomain 610, a pretilt angle of a second domain boundary region 626 inthe second domain 620 is greater than a pretilt angle of a secondnormal-luminance region 624, and a pretilt angle of the second alignmentfilm 230 is constant in the two regions 624 and 626. Therefore, analignment vector of the domain boundary region 626 is greater than analignment vector of the normal-luminance region 624.

If the alignment vectors of the domain boundary regions 616 and 626 aregreater than the alignment vectors of the normal-luminance regions 614and 624 as described above, more liquid crystal molecules may crosspolarization axes of polarizers in the domain boundary regions 616 and626. As a result, since an increasing amount of the light, which passedthrough a liquid crystal layer, may pass through a second polarizer 220,the width and area of DBTs may be reduced, and the aperture ratio of aunit pixel may increase. Although the pretilt angles and alignmentvectors in the vertical boundary region between the first domain 610 andthe second domain 620 have been described so far, it will be understoodby those of ordinary skill in the art that in the horizontal boundaryregions between the first and fourth domains 610 and 640, the apertureratio and light transmittance efficiency of a unit pixel may beincreased by having the pretilt angles and alignment vectors greaterthan those of adjacent normal-luminance regions.

FIG. 6B is a plan view showing an arrangement of liquid crystalmolecules located in the middle of the liquid crystal layer of FIG. 6A,taken along line VI(b)-VI(b)′ of FIG. 6A in parallel with the first andsecond substrates 100 and 200. In other words, FIG. 6B is a plan viewshowing an arrangement of liquid crystal molecules located in the domainboundary regions 616 and 626 and the normal-luminance regions 614 and624. In FIG. 6B, rods represent individual liquid crystal molecules, andthe more parallel to the first and second substrates 100 and 200 theliquid crystal molecules are arranged, the longer their associated rodsare represented. Referring to FIG. 6B, since the pretilt angles of thedomain boundary regions 616 and 626 are greater than the pretilt anglesof the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624, the arrangement of theliquid crystal molecules in the domain boundary regions 616 and 626becomes more similar to the arrangement of the liquid crystal moleculesin the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624, reducing the area and widthof DBTs.

Because the pretilt angles of the first and second alignment films 130and 230 in the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624 are orthogonal toeach other but the same in size, the alignment vectors 612 and 622 crosspolarization axes 122 and 222 at an angle of substantially 45°, andcause the light, an amount of which corresponds to a pixel potentialprovided to the unit pixel, to pass through the unit pixel. However, inthe boundary regions where the first and second domains 610 and 620 comein contact with each other, the third, first and second alignmentvectors 232, 132 and 134 coexist and the liquid crystal molecules arearranged substantially parallel to the first polarization axis 122rather than crossing the first polarization axis 122, blocking the lightfrom the backlight assembly and causing DBTs. However, if liquid crystalmolecules in the boundary regions 616 and 626 are arranged similar tothe alignment vectors of the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624, thearea of DBTs may be reduced.

Therefore, as described in relation to FIG. 6A, the pretilt angles ofthe domain boundary regions 616 and 626 are set to be greater than thepretilt angles of the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624. Then, asshown in FIG. 6B, liquid crystal molecules IALC positioned at the edgesof the domain boundary regions 616 and 626 are arranged similar toliquid crystal molecules in the normal-luminance regions 614 and 624,improving luminance of the domain boundary regions 616 and 626.

In other words, the domain boundary regions 616 and 626 have textures617 and 627 and luminance-improved regions 619 and 629. In other words,the domain boundary region 616 in the first domain 610 is greater thanthe normal-luminance region 614 in terms of the pretilt angle.Therefore, liquid crystal molecules at the edge of the domain boundaryregion 616 are arranged similar to the alignment vector of thenormal-luminance region 614, forming the luminance-improved region 619where the luminance is improved since the light from the backlightassembly can pass through the second polarizer 220. However, liquidcrystal molecules in the other part of the domain boundary region 616are arranged substantially parallel to the polarization axes 122 and222, forming the texture regions 617 and 627 where the light from thebacklight assembly cannot pass through the second polarizer 220.

Therefore, widths of the domain boundary regions 616 and 626 having alarge pretilt angle are broader than the measured widths of the DBTs 617and 627. Referring to FIG. 6B, a sum of the widths of the domainboundary regions 616 and 626 in the first and second domains 610 and 620is greater than a width of the DBT measured between the first and seconddomains 610 and 620. Herein, the measured width of the DBT between thedomains is a sum of widths of the DBTs 617 and 627 in the respectivedomains 610 and 620, and as described in connection with FIG. 4, themeasured width is a width corresponding to the medium luminance betweenthe maximum luminance and the minimum luminance, which is measured in aunit pixel when a gray scale voltage for the maximum luminance isapplied to the unit pixel.

A structure of a unit pixel similar to that of FIG. 3 will now bedescribed referring to the alignment of liquid crystal molecules in thedomain boundary regions 616 and 626 and normal-luminance regions 614 and624 of FIGS. 6A and 6B, and the principle of light transmission. A unitpixel is divided into domains by DBTs, and each domain has a pluralityof alignment vectors. For example, the first domain 610 has an alignmentvector 612 of the normal-luminance region 614 and an alignment vector612′ of the domain vertical-boundary region 523. The alignment vector612 of the normal-luminance region 614, which corresponds to the majorregion of a specific domain, is the major alignment vector of the firstdomain 610. The alignment vector 612′ of the domain vertical-boundaryregion 523, which corresponds to the minor region of a specific domain,is an additional alignment vector of the first domain 610. The firstdomain 610 may further have an alignment vector of the domainhorizontal-boundary region 524 as another additional alignment vector.

The additional alignment vectors of the vertical and horizontal boundaryregions 523 and 524 are different from the major alignment vector 612 ofthe normal-luminance region 614. To be specific, the pretilt angles ofthe first substrate 100 or the second substrate 200 by virtue of theadditional alignment vectors of the boundary regions 523 and 524 aregreater than the pretilt angles of the substrates 100 and 200 in thenormal-luminance region 614, contributing to a decrease in the width ofDBTs and an increase in the light transmittance efficiency and apertureratio of the unit pixel.

The large pretilt angle can reduce the area of DBTs, but the increase inthe pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region may cause degradationin the display quality such as a black afterimage phenomenon in the lowgray scale. In addition, the increase in the pretilt angle of thenormal-luminance region may increase the width of fringe field regions.Therefore, the pretilt angles of the normal-luminance regions and thepretilt angles of the domain boundary regions may be properly adjusted.

FIG. 7A is a plan view of a unit pixel with multiple domains, on whichan FFT occurs at the edge of a pixel electrode, according to anexemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 7B is a crosssectional view of the unit pixel showing a fringe field in the unitpixel and an arrangement of liquid crystal molecules in the FFT, takenalong line VII(b)-VII(b)′ of FIG. 7A.

Referring to FIG. 7A, in a second domain 620 of a unit pixel 400, thereexist fringe field liquid crystal molecules FFLC, which are arranged, bythe fringe field, in a direction opposite to liquid crystal moleculesNLLC in a normal-luminance region 624. In the second domain 620, therefurther exist FFT liquid crystal molecules FFTX, which are placedbetween the liquid crystal molecules NLLC of the normal-luminance region624 and the liquid crystal molecules FFLC and are parallel orperpendicular to polarization axes 122 and 222. The FFT liquid crystalmolecules FFTX block light and reduce the luminance in the unit pixel.

FIG. 7B is a cross section of the unit pixel 400, for describing anoccurrence of the FFT 526 in FIG. 7A. Referring to FIG. 7B, a secondsubstrate 200 has a second alignment film 230 and a common electrode240, which is arranged all over the second substrate 200 and providedwith a constant voltage from the outside of a liquid crystal displaypanel. A first substrate 100 has a first alignment film 130 and a pixelelectrode 500, which is formed on every unit pixel and has an edgeregion 530 thereon. The edge region 530 is the last part of the pixelelectrode 500 affected by a voltage on the pixel electrode 500, andforms a fringe field 450 together with the common electrode 240. Liquidcrystal molecules FFLC coming under influence of the fringe field 450are tilted to substantially perpendicularly cross the fringe field 450.In other words, the fringe field liquid crystal molecules FFLC aretitled in a direction opposite to the direction in which the liquidcrystal molecules NLLC in a normal-luminance region 510 of the pixelelectrode 500 are tilted.

Therefore, the liquid crystal molecules FFTX at the part where theliquid crystal molecules FFLC caught by the fringe field 450 and theliquid crystal molecules NLLC in the normal-luminance region 510 meet,are arranged perpendicular to the substrates 100 and 200 as shown inFIG. 7B, and form an FFT 526 where the luminance decreases. Since thefringe field liquid crystal molecules FFLC are tilted diagonally withrespect to the substrates 100 and 200, the light from the backlightassembly may pass through them, causing a bright portion to appearoutside the FFT 526 in FIG. 7A.

To reduce the area of the FFT 526, a pretilt angle of the edge region530 of the pixel electrode 500 may be increased. In other words, if thepretilt angle in the vicinity of the edge region 530 is small, the areaof the FFT 526 may increase. For example, if the pretilt angle of thealignment film 130 or 230 in the edge region 530 is large, liquidcrystal molecules located in the FFT 526 are tilted more and the amountof light passing through the edge region 530 of the pixel electrode 500may increase, causing a possible reduction in the area of the FFT 526.On the other hand, if the pretilt angle of the alignment film 130 of 230in the edge region 530 of the pixel electrode 500 is small, liquidcrystal molecules located in the FFT 526 are perpendicular to thesubstrates 100 and 200, and the amount of light passing through the edgeregion 530 of the pixel electrode 500 decreases, causing an increase inthe area of the FFT 526.

As is apparent from the foregoing description, providing the domainboundary regions and the fringe field regions with larger pretiltangles, and the normal-luminance regions with smaller pretilt angles canimprove the characteristics of a unit pixel. In accordance withexemplary embodiments of the present invention, a process capable ofapplying different pretilt angles to different regions in a unit pixel,and an optical mask for the process, will now be described.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing a substrate and optical masks for a processof forming pretilt angles in unit pixels of a liquid crystal displaypanel by irradiating polarized UV light to the substrate coated with aphoto-alignment material, according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention. Referring to FIG. 8, a plurality of optical masks 800are arranged outside one side of a photo-alignment substrate 20 wherepretilt angles are to be formed. On the photo-alignment substrate 20, aphoto-alignment material layer (not shown) is prepared by a process suchas spraying, inkjetting and printing, on which a pretilt is to be madeby reacting to polarized UV light. The photo-alignment substrate 20 maybe one of the above-described first and second substrates 100 and 200.

The optical masks 800 have a plurality of unit masking patterns (notshown) with a plurality of same shapes for forming pretilts in aplurality of unit pixels. The optical masks 800 are arranged outside thephoto-alignment substrate 20, forming a plurality of lines, and causepolarized UV light to be irradiated to the photo-alignment substrate 20,while moving over the photo-alignment substrate 20. For example, theoptical masks 800 in FIG. 8 are arranged in two alternating lines.

The optical masks 800 each have a micro overlapping region MOL with apattern formed at their edges so that polarized UV light may passthrough the edges. When a specific optical mask moves over thephoto-alignment substrate 20, its micro overlapping region MOL overlapsa micro overlapping region of another adjacent optical mask arranged inanother line along the direction in which the optical mask moves. Hence,polarized UV light may be irradiated to the entire surface of thephoto-alignment substrate 20.

However, if the micro overlapping region MOL is wide, a stitchphenomenon may be observed on the liquid crystal display panel. Thestitch phenomenon refers to a phenomenon in which stains are locallyviewed on the liquid crystal display panel, and the stitch is caused byexcessive light energy focused on a specific region in thephoto-alignment process. Therefore, a width of the micro overlappingregion MOL is set much narrower than a pitch of a unit pixel, i.e., alength or width of one side of the unit pixel. For example, the width ofthe micro overlapping region MOL is set narrower than 10 μm. Since awidth of a common unit pixel is 150 μm to 450 μm, the overlapping of 10μm affects the stitch of the unit pixel slightly. In the alternative,the micro overlapping region MOL may correspond to the position of wiresof a unit pixel. In addition, the ‘cosine’ shape of the microoverlapping region MOL in the enlarged part of FIG. 8 can reduce thewidth of the actual overlapping region, contributing to a furtherreduction in the stitch effect.

The process of forming pretilts in the photo-alignment substrate 20 canbe divided into three steps. A first step is to move optical masks 802arranged outside one side of the photo-alignment substrate 20 to theoutside of the opposite side of the photo-alignment substrate 20 along aforward direction FW. In this step, polarized UV light is obliquelyirradiated to the first half area of each unit pixel at a specific anglewith respect to the optical masks 802.

A second step is to move the optical masks 804, which have completelypassed over the photo-alignment substrate 20, in a downward direction bya half of a pitch p of the unit pixel, and then move them along areverse direction RW. In this process, polarized UV light is irradiatedto the photo-alignment substrate 20 in a direction opposite to that inthe first step, and the second half area of each unit pixel is alsoprepared for pretilt forming. A third step is to apply heat to aphoto-alignment material layer to which polarized UV light isirradiated. In this process, a solvent, which was mixed with aphoto-alignment material to stably coat the substrate 20 with thephoto-alignment material, is vaporized and the photo-alignment materialhas pretilts.

In the alternative, a process of forming pretilts in the photo-alignmentsubstrate 20 may include a process of fixing positions of the opticalmasks 800 and moving the photo-alignment substrate 20 with respect tothe optical masks 800 on a relative basis. In yet another alternative, aprocess of forming pretilts in the photo-alignment substrate 20 mayinclude a process of arranging two sets of optical masks 800 at twofacing outsides of the photo-alignment substrate 20, and moving each setof the optical masks 800 in the forward direction FW and the reversedirection RW.

The current embodiment of the present invention is provided to formdifferent pretilt angles for a domain boundary region and anormal-luminance region in one domain. Through the aforementionedpretilt forming process, a pretilt of a domain boundary region and apretilt of a normal-luminance region are formed on a half area of eachunit pixel in one direction, and a different pretilt of the domainboundary region and a different pretilt of the normal-luminance regionare formed on the other half area in the opposite direction. The pretiltforming process according to exemplary embodiments of the presentinvention forms the pretilts of the domain boundary regions and thenormal-luminance regions not sequentially but simultaneously,contributing to simplification of the process and reduction of theprocess's time.

Since a liquid crystal display panel is manufactured by assembling twosubstrates, a liquid crystal display panel having four domains may bemanufactured by assembling two photo-alignment substrates in whichpretilts are formed by the above process, such that their polarized UVlight's irradiation directions are orthogonal to each other. In thealternative, pretilts may be formed only in one substrate of the liquidcrystal display panel. To be specific, polarized UV light is irradiatedat the opposite sides of one photo-alignment substrate in one direction,allowing the photo-alignment substrate to have two pretilts of thedomain boundary regions and two pretilts of the normal-luminanceregions. If the same process is performed on the photo-alignmentsubstrate in a direction different by 90°, one photo-alignment substratehas four domains. Thereafter, by assembling another substrate of nopretilt with the photo-alignment substrate while a liquid crystal layeris interposed between the substrates, a liquid crystal display panel,whose individual unit pixel has four different alignment vectors, ismanufactured.

Each of the optical masks 800 for the aforementioned process has aplurality of repeatedly formed unit masking patterns. FIG. 9A is a planview of a unit masking pattern which is disposed on an optical mask andis patterned to give a unit pixel different pretilt angles in a domainboundary region and a normal-luminance region, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 9A, a unitmasking pattern 810 has a non-irradiation part pattern 820, anormal-luminance region pattern 830, and a domain boundary regionpattern 840. The optical mask 800 having the unit masking pattern 810 ismanufactured with a transparent quartz or glass substrate. Each unitmasking pattern 810 may have light blocking films formed on thetransparent substrate of the optical mask 800. The light blocking filmsmay be made of a material capable of efficiently blocking light, such aschromium metal, and may be manufactured in various shapes to adjust theamount of light energy passing through the unit masking patterns 810.

To be specific, the non-irradiation part pattern 820, which is a patterncorresponding to a region of a unit pixel, causes no polarized UV lightto be irradiated to that region, and has a first light blocking regionand blocks all the light irradiated thereto. Therefore, no pretilt isformed on the half area of a unit pixel covered by the non-irradiationpart pattern 820. The normal-luminance region pattern 830, which is apattern corresponding to the normal-luminance region 510 in a unitpixel, is divided into a second light blocking region 832 and a firstlight transmission region 834 to block a part of the light irradiatedthereto. A ratio of an area of the light blocking region 832 to thetotal area of the normal-luminance region pattern 830 is a lightblocking ratio of the normal-luminance region 510. Since the unitmasking pattern 810 moves in one direction during the photo-alignmentprocess, even though the light blocking region 832 exists only in aspecific part of the normal-luminance region pattern 830, continuous anduniform-energy light is irradiated to the unit pixel.

The domain boundary region pattern 840 is positioned between thenon-irradiation part pattern 820 and the normal-luminance region pattern830. Since the domain boundary region should receive greater lightenergy than the normal-luminance region 510 to obtain a large pretiltangle, a light blocking ratio of the domain boundary region pattern 840is lower than that of the normal-luminance region pattern 830. Forexample, since the domain boundary region pattern 840 of FIG. 9A has nolight blocking region, its light blocking ratio is 0%, whereas a lightblocking ratio of the normal-luminance region pattern 830 is greaterthan 0%. It should be noted that according to an exemplary embodiment ofthe present invention, the light blocking ratio of the normal-luminanceregion pattern 830 is between the light blocking ratios of thenon-irradiation part pattern 820 and the domain boundary region pattern840.

Since the regions 820, 830 and 840 of the unit masking pattern 810 havedifferent light blocking ratios, energy of the light irradiated to theunit pixel is also different according to where the regions 820, 830 and840 overlap the unit pixel. FIG. 9B is a graph showing energies of thelight irradiated to a photo-alignment substrate after passing throughthe unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 9A with respect to the regions 820,830 and 840 of the unit masking pattern 810. Referring to FIG. 9B, sincelight cannot pass through the non-irradiation part pattern 820, energyE(BLK) of the light irradiated to the photo-alignment substrate is 0mJ/cm². In addition, energy E(DBT) of the light passing through thedomain boundary region pattern 840 is greatest, and energy E(NL) of thelight passing through the normal-luminance region pattern 830 has avalue between the other two values. These different light energies causedifferent pretilt angles to be made in different regions of the unitpixel.

While the domain boundary region pattern 840 in FIG. 9A has no lightblocking region, the normal-luminance region pattern 830 has a widelight blocking region 832. Therefore, energies of the light, that thenormal-luminance region and the domain boundary region of the unit pixelreceive, undergo an abrupt change in their adjacent regions, and liquidcrystal molecules located in the adjacent regions cannot be controlledeasily, causing degradation in the display quality of the unit pixel.Therefore, the domain boundary region pattern 840 may have an additionalpattern, formed adjacent to the normal-luminance region pattern 830,with a light blocking ratio between the light blocking ratios of thenormal-luminance region pattern 830 and the domain boundary regionpattern 840.

FIG. 10A is a plan view of a unit masking pattern with a domain boundaryregion pattern divided into a plurality of irradiation patterns,according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. It is tobe noted that the unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 10A is different fromthe unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 9A in that the domain boundaryregion pattern 840 has a plurality of irradiation patterns. To bespecific, the domain boundary region pattern (or DBT region) 840includes a first irradiation pattern 842 with no light blocking region,and a second irradiation pattern 848 having a third light blockingregion 844. Therefore, when the unit masking pattern 810 moves in aspecific direction while undergoing irradiation of polarized UV light,the light passing through the second irradiation pattern 848 is less inenergy than the light passing through the first irradiation pattern 842.

The second irradiation pattern 848 in FIG. 10A has the third lightblocking region 844 in a triangular shape. The third light blockingregion 844 is an isosceles triangle in shape, with its bottom side incontact with the normal-luminance region while its light blocking lengthLBL gradually changes. Herein, the light blocking length LBL is a lengthof a light blocking region in parallel to the unit masking pattern 810or a forward direction FW in which the light is irradiated when the unitmasking pattern 810 moves. To be specific, the closer the light blockinglength LBL is to the normal-luminance region pattern 830, the longer thelight blocking length LBL becomes; the closer the light blocking lengthLBL is to the first irradiation pattern 842, the shorter the lightblocking length LBL becomes. Therefore, energy of the light passingthrough the second irradiation pattern 848 gradually decreases ininverse proportion to the light blocking length LBL.

FIG. 10B is a graph showing energies of polarized UV light passingthrough the unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 10A with respect to theregions 820, 830 and 840 of the unit masking pattern 810. Referring toFIG. 10B, energy of the light passing through the domain boundary regionpattern 840 is divided into two types. To be specific, the first-typeenergy E(DBT1) of the light passing through the first irradiationpattern 842 is the greatest and constant among the energies of the lightpassing through the unit masking pattern 810. On the other hand, thesecond-type energy E(DBT2) of the light passing through the secondirradiation pattern 848 gradually decreases from the energy E(DBT1) ofthe light passing through the first irradiation pattern 842 to theenergy E(NL) of the light passing through the normal-luminance regionpattern 830. Since light cannot pass through the non-irradiation partpattern 820, its energy is 0 mJ/cm², and the energy E(NL) of the lightpassing through the normal-luminance region pattern 830 is lower thanthe energy E(DBT2) of the light passing through the second irradiationpattern 848.

The second irradiation pattern 848 of the domain boundary region pattern840 may be made in a part of the domain boundary region in variousshapes capable of forming specific pretilt angles. For example, in FIG.10A, the third light blocking region 844 of the second irradiationpattern 848 is an isosceles triangle in shape, and can gradually changethe amount of polarized UV light irradiated to the substrate withrespect to the configuration thereof. The third light blocking region844 may be formed in various other shapes.

FIGS. 11A to 11E are plan views of unit masking patterns, according toexemplary embodiments of the present invention, which show anon-irradiation part pattern, a normal-luminance region pattern, and adomain boundary region pattern, each having different shapes. Accordingto exemplary embodiments of the present invention, energy of the lightirradiated to the photo-alignment substrate after passing through theunit masking patterns is least to greatest in order of the light passingthrough the non-irradiation part pattern, the light passing through thenormal-luminance region pattern, and the light passing through thedomain boundary region pattern.

FIG. 11A is a plan view of a unit masking pattern 810, in which a domainboundary region pattern 840 is divided into three different regionsaccording to the size of the third light blocking region 844. Thus, thepretilt angle of the domain boundary region changes according to theconfiguration of the light blocking region 844, enabling fine control ofthe arrangement of liquid crystal molecules. Although the DBT region isdivided into three sub regions in FIG. 11A, it will be understood bythose of ordinary skill in the art that the number of sub regions is notlimited thereto.

FIG. 11B is a plan view of a unit masking pattern 810, in which unlikethose shown in FIGS. 9A, 10A and 11A, the light blocking region 832 ofthe normal-luminance region pattern 830 is arranged not at the center ofthe normal-luminance region pattern 830 but at one side thereof. Likethe light blocking region 832 of the normal-luminance region pattern830, the third light blocking region 844 of the domain boundary regionpattern 840 also shifts toward one side of the domain boundary regionpattern 840. Since the unit masking pattern 810 undergoes irradiation ofpolarized UV light while moving in a specific direction during thephoto-alignment process, its light blocking regions 832 and 844 areallowed to shift towards one side. While the light blocking pattern 844of the domain boundary region pattern 840 in FIG. 11B is rectangular inshape, in the alternative, the light blocking pattern 844 may be made ina triangular shape whose light blocking length LBL gradually changes asin FIG. 10A so that pretilt angles of the domain boundary region maygradually change.

FIG. 11C is a plan view of a unit masking pattern 810, in which thethird light blocking region 844 of the domain boundary region pattern840 is extended compared with that of FIG. 10A. In FIG. 11C, since thethird light blocking region 844 of the domain boundary region pattern840 is formed like in FIG. 10A, its light blocking length LBL graduallydecreases as it goes from the normal-luminance region pattern 830 to thenon-irradiation part pattern 820. Therefore, for the domain boundaryregion, as it goes from a region adjacent to the normal-luminance regionin contact with its one side to a region close to an adjacent domain incontact with its other side, its pretilt angles increase.

FIG. 11D is a plan view of a unit masking pattern 810 with lightblocking regions having different light transmittances. In terms of thelight transmittance, the light blocking region of the non-irradiationpart pattern 820 is lowest, and the third light blocking region 844 ofthe domain boundary region pattern 840 is highest. The lighttransmittance of the normal-luminance region pattern 830 has a valuebetween the light transmittances of the other two regions.

FIG. 11E is a plan view of a unit masking pattern 810, in which lightblocking regions and light transmission regions of both of thenormal-luminance region pattern 830 and the domain boundary regionpattern 840 are repeated. In the repeated patterns, the lighttransmission regions serve as slits diffracting light, and since theyare formed in spacings of several μm, it is possible to adjust pretiltangles of the unit pixel.

The unit masking patterns may be made in a variety of different shapesas shown in FIGS. 9A, 10A and 11A to 11E. The energies of the lightpassing through constituent regions of the unit masking patterns areadjusted to improve the display quality of a liquid crystal display byreducing black afterimages and improve an aperture ratio of each unitpixel by reducing areas of the abnormal-luminance regions where texturesare formed.

FIG. 12 is a graph showing a relationship between light transmittance ofa unit pixel and a ratio of energy of light irradiated to anormal-luminance region to energy of light irradiated to a domainboundary region of a unit pixel. Referring to FIG. 12, the values ofboth energies of light irradiated to the domain boundary region andnormal-luminance region and the pretilt angles thereof in obtainingexcellent light transmittance was found.

The horizontal axis of FIG. 12 represents ratios of energies of lightirradiated to the normal-luminance regions and energies of lightirradiated to the domain boundary regions of a unit pixel. The verticalaxis thereof represents light transmittance obtained by measuring anactual luminance of a liquid crystal display panel having a plurality ofunit pixels. The data was obtained by measuring light transmittances forenergies 10 mJ/cm², 20 mJ/cm² and 30 mJ/cm² of the light irradiated tothe domain boundary regions.

For the measurements, the unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 9A, to whichthe domain boundary region pattern 840 with no light blocking region wasapplied, was used, and illuminance of the polarized UV light irradiatedto the unit masking pattern 810 was 40 mW/cm². For energies of the lightirradiated to the domain boundary region to be 10 mJ/cm², 20 mJ/cm² and30 mJ/cm², the substrate for photo-alignment was transferred at a speedof 180 mm/sec, 120 mm/sec and 60 mm/sec, respectively. Pretilt angles ofthe alignment film used for the measurement of FIG. 12 were roughlyproportional to the energies of the irradiated light. In other words,pretilt angles for energies 9 mJ/cm², 10 mJ/cm², 20 mJ/cm² and 30 mJ/cm²of the irradiated light were 1.60°, 1.61°, 1.78° and 1.80°,respectively.

Referring to FIG. 12, for each curve, its maximum light transmittanceappeared when the energy of the light irradiated to the normal-luminanceregion was about 30% of the energy of the light irradiated to the domainboundary region. If the ratio is less than 30%, a pretilt angle of thenormal-luminance region decreases, causing the liquid crystal moleculesadjacent to an alignment layer to be disposed more perpendicular to thealignment layer of the normal luminance region and a decrease in thelight transmittance. On the contrary, if the ratio is greater than 30%,a difference between the pretilt angle of the domain boundary region andthe pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region decreases, causing anincrease in the area of the domain boundary region and a decrease in thelight transmittance.

Therefore, in a unit pixel, according to an exemplary embodiment of thepresent invention, the energy of the light irradiated to thenormal-luminance region is about 30% of the energy of the lightirradiated to the domain boundary region. The term ‘about 30%’ means arange between 25% and 35%. Since the graph of FIG. 12 was obtained usingthe domain boundary region pattern 840 with no light blocking region asshown in FIG. 9A, the area of the light blocking region 832 in thenormal-luminance region pattern 830 is about 30% of the area of thenormal-luminance region pattern 830.

It can be seen from FIG. 12 that light transmittance was excellent atenergy 30 mJ/cm² of the light irradiated to the domain boundary region.It addition, since the light transmittance was best when the energy ofthe light irradiated to the normal-luminance region was 30% of theenergy of the light irradiated to the domain boundary region, to improvelight transmittance of the unit pixel, the pretilt angle of the domainboundary region can be greater than 1.80°, which was a pretilt angle atthe energy 30 mJ/cm² of the irradiated light.

In addition, the energy of the light irradiated to the normal-luminanceregion is 9 mJ/cm² or 30% of the energy of the light irradiated to thedomain boundary region, and its associated pretilt angle is 1.60°.Therefore, it could be seen that since a difference between pretiltangles of the domain boundary region and the normal-luminance region was0.20°, a difference between pretilt angels of a domain boundary regionand a normal-luminance region of a unit pixel may be 0.20° or more.

Increasing the pretilt angle to improve light transmittance may causeblack afterimages in a unit pixel. Therefore, pretilt angles that canimprove both the light transmittance and the black afterimage are to bedetermined. Now, reference will be made to FIGS. 13A and 13B to describepretilt angles of normal-luminance regions where black afterimages wereimproved.

FIG. 13A is a table showing black afterimage indices associated withobservation positions of one observer. The black afterimage index isdivided into 5 levels according to how much the luminance or chrominanceobserved at the front or side of a liquid crystal display panel isdifferent from a normal value. The observation at the front is made onemeter away from the image, and the observation at the side is made onemeter away from the image and at an angle of 60° with respect to thefront of the image. In the observation, the quality of an image observedat the front and side is classified into ‘Good’, ‘Slightly Poor’ and‘Little Poor’. Then a black afterimage index for one liquid crystaldisplay panel based on the observations made by one observer can bedetermined from the table of FIG. 13A.

A black afterimage value of a liquid crystal display panel is determinedas an average of black afterimage indices measured by several observers.If the black afterimage value is 2, a good image is observed in frontthereof and a slightly poor image can be recognized at the side thereofby an expert like the observer. Therefore, a liquid crystal displaypanel with a black afterimage value of 1 or 2 is commonly classified asa normal liquid crystal display panel.

FIG. 13B is a graph showing a relationship between observed blackafterimage values and energies of the light irradiated to anormal-luminance region of a unit pixel over time after the manufactureof a liquid crystal display panel. Pretilt angles and energies of thelight irradiated to the normal-luminance region of a unit pixel that cangive the unit pixel an excellent display quality without blackafterimages, can be determined from FIG. 13B. To obtain the blackafterimage values of FIG. 13B, the alignment film of FIG. 12 was appliedto the test liquid crystal display panel, and light with energies of 3mJ/cm² and 10 mJ/cm² was irradiated to the alignment film. Themanufactured liquid crystal display panel was stored at 25° C.

Referring to FIG. 13B, for the normal-luminance region that underwentirradiation of light with the energy of 10 mJ/cm², its black afterimagevalue exceeded 2, twelve hours after the liquid crystal display panelwas manufactured, and the black afterimage value continued to increaseover time. It can be seen that since the observed black afterimage valueexceeded 2, which is the black afterimage value of the liquid crystaldisplay panel having the excellent display quality, it is not good toirradiate the light with the energy of 10 mJ/cm² to the normal-luminanceregion.

Since the black afterimage value of the normal-luminance region, whichunderwent irradiation of the 3 mJ/cm²-energy light, was 2, twelve hoursafter the manufacturing, and remained at 2 past twelve hours, 3 mJ/cm²is an appropriate energy of the light that can be irradiated to thenormal-luminance region. Therefore, it could be seen that irradiatinglight with the energy of 3 mJ/cm² or less to the normal-luminance regionof the unit pixel and the pretilt angle corresponding to 3 mJ/cm²contributed to the manufacture of a liquid crystal display panel havingan excellent display quality.

For the black afterimage value and light transmittance of the liquidcrystal display panel to be improved, a width of the domain boundaryregion of the unit pixel may be properly determined. FIG. 14 is a graphshowing a relationship between a width of a domain boundary region of aunit pixel and light transmittance of the unit pixel when lights withdifferent energies are irradiated to the domain boundary region andnormal-luminance region of the unit pixel. How to determine the width ofthe domain boundary region of a unit pixel with an improved lighttransmittance can be understood from FIG. 14.

In FIG. 14, the unit mJ/cm² of light energy is omitted from acombination (a, b) of energy ‘a’ of the light irradiated to anormal-luminance region of a unit pixel and energy ‘b’ of the lightirradiated to a domain boundary region of a unit pixel. In other words,there are three types of (a, b): (10, 33), (4.5, 15) and (10, 10).Herein, a unit pixel to which (10, 10) was applied was used as areference unit pixel (or object to be compared) having no domainboundary region.

Each of the combinations is divided into two different unit pixels, andwidths of domain boundary regions are 10 μm and 13 μm, respectively. Theexperiment was performed under conditions that light was irradiated tothe domain boundary regions through the unit masking pattern 810 havingthe first irradiation pattern 842 comprised of only the lighttransmission region and the second irradiation pattern 848 having apartial light blocking region, as shown in FIG. 10A, and the twoirradiation regions of the unit masking pattern 810 were the same inwidth.

Referring to FIG. 14, the lower the energy of the light irradiated tothe normal-luminance region was, the lower the light transmittance was.In other words, for a unit pixel in which 4.5 mJ/cm²-energy light wasirradiated to the normal-luminance region and a width of the domainboundary region was 10 μm, its light transmittance was 5.18%, which islower than light transmittance 5.21% of the reference unit pixel.However, the light transmittance of the unit pixel increased with theincrease in the width of the domain boundary region. For example, if thedomain boundary region of the unit pixel, to which 4.5 mJ/cm²-energy wasapplied, increased from 10 μm to 13 μm in width, the light transmittanceof the unit pixel increased to 5.20%, becoming similar to the lighttransmittance 5.21% of the reference unit pixel. Likewise, for (10, 33),the increase in the width of the domain boundary region contributed toimproving the light transmittance of the unit pixel. Therefore, it canbe seen that the width of the domain boundary region may be appropriatewhen greater than 10 μm.

An appropriate width of the domain boundary region may be found using arelationship between widths of various domain boundary region patternsand associated light transmittances of the unit pixel. FIG. 15A is aplan view of a unit masking pattern 810, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention, to which a domain boundary regionpattern 840 and a second irradiation pattern 848 with various widths areapplicable. FIG. 15B is a graph showing a relationship between an areaor width of the domain boundary region pattern 840 and the secondirradiation pattern 848 of the unit masking pattern 810 in FIG. 15A andassociated light transmittances of a unit pixel.

Referring to FIG. 15A, while the second irradiation pattern 848 of thedomain boundary region pattern 840 has a third light blocking region 844and a second light transmission region 846, the first irradiationpattern 842 has only a light transmission region without any lightblocking region. The first and second irradiation patterns 842 and 848are the same in width and area, so width w(DBT) of the domain boundaryregion pattern 840 is double a width w(DBTS) of the second irradiationpattern 848. By adjusting the width w(DBT) of the domain boundary regionpattern 840, light transmittance of the unit pixel may change asrepresented in FIG. 15B.

The horizontal axis of FIG. 15B represents various parenthesizedcombinations of widths w(DBT) of the domain boundary region pattern 840and widths w(DBTS) of the second irradiation pattern 848. The widths ofthe domain boundary region pattern 840 range from 7.0 μm to 13.0 μm, anda reference unit masking pattern (or object to be compared) is a unitmasking pattern in which the domain boundary region pattern 840 withoutthe second irradiation pattern 848 is formed 10 μm thick.

The vertical axis of FIG. 15B represents measured light transmittancesof the unit pixel when 33 mJ/cm²-energy light is irradiated to the unitmasking pattern 810 having the combinations of widths of the domainboundary region pattern 840 and widths of the second irradiation pattern848 on the horizontal axis. Referring to FIG. 15B, light transmittancesof the unit pixel are roughly proportional to widths of the domainboundary region pattern 840 and the second irradiation pattern 848. Inother words, while the light transmittance is 5.24% for the width 3.5 μmof the second irradiation pattern 848, as the width increases to 5.0 μmand 6.5 μm, the light transmittance increases to 5.28% and 5.30%,respectively. Therefore, it may be appropriate that the secondirradiation pattern 848 of the domain boundary region pattern 840 in theunit masking pattern 810 is wide.

However, the light transmittance for the width 6.5 μm of the secondirradiation pattern 848 was 5.30%, which was the same as that of thereference unit masking pattern where the domain boundary region pattern840 was 10.0 μm in width while the second irradiation pattern 848 doesnot exist. In addition, the light transmittance for the width 5.0 μm ofthe second irradiation pattern 848 is 5.28%, which is similar to 5.30%of the reference unit masking pattern. Therefore, it may be appropriateto set the width of the second irradiation pattern 848 of the domainboundary region pattern 840 to 6.5 μm. In addition, considering the casewhere the second irradiation pattern 848 showing excellent lighttransmittance is 5.0 m thick, it may be appropriate to set the width ofthe second irradiation pattern 848 to 6.5±1.5 μm. Therefore, the widthof the domain boundary region pattern 840 may be properly set to13.0±3.0 μm, given that the first and second irradiation patterns 842and 848 of the domain boundary region pattern 840 were the same inwidth.

The aforementioned unit pixel has an FFT partially along its edge inaddition to the DBT. To reduce the FFT, a pretilt angle at the edge ofthe unit pixel may be increased by using a shape of a light blockingregion of the unit masking pattern.

FIG. 16A is a plan view of a unit masking pattern, to which a fringefield region pattern is applied to increase a pretilt angle at an edgeof a unit pixel, according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention. Referring to FIG. 16A, a fringe field region pattern 850 isformed at an edge of a unit masking pattern 810. The fringe field regionpattern 850 is divided into a light blocking region 852 and a lighttransmission region 854, and a pretilt angle at the edge of the unitpixel may be increased by adjusting a ratio of areas of the two regions,contributing to reducing the fringe field region of the unit pixel.However, if the unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 16A is applied, due tothe alignment vectors of the domains, light transmittance increases at apart of one side of the unit pixel on which the fringe field regionpattern 850 appears, while the light transmittance may reduce in theother parts of the side.

FIGS. 16B to 16D are diagrams showing alignment vectors of a unit pixeland a local light transmittance change of the unit pixel, caused by thealignment vectors, when the unit masking pattern 810 of FIG. 16A isapplied to first and second substrates 100 and 200 of the unit pixel.According to FIGS. 16B to 16D, a light transmittance on a part of oneside of the unit pixel increases, while that of the other part of theside decreases.

FIG. 16B is a diagram showing a pretilt angle which is made on analignment film of the first substrate 100. The first substrate 100 iscoated with an alignment film (not shown), to which the polarized UVlight that passed through the unit masking patterns 810 of FIG. 16A isirradiated in two different directions parallel to the y-axis. Althoughthe unit masking pattern 810 has the shape of FIG. 16A, it will beunderstood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the greater theenergy of the light irradiated to a specific part on the substrate is,the brighter the part can be represented. Through this unit maskingpattern 810, low-energy light is irradiated to the normal-luminanceregion 510 of the unit pixel on the first substrate 100, and high-energylight is irradiated to the DBT 522 and FFT 526.

FIG. 16C is a diagram showing a pretilt angle which is formed on analignment film of the second substrate 200. Although the pretilt angleof the second substrate 200 is obtained by the same process and unitmasking pattern as those used in FIG. 16B, the light is irradiated intwo different directions parallel to the x-axis.

FIG. 16D is a plan view of a unit pixel 400, showing alignment vectors,DBTs and FFTs, which are formed according to the processes of FIGS. 16Band 16C. Referring to FIG. 16D, alignment vectors of each domain aredifferent according to their specific locations. Specifically, analignment vector of the normal-luminance region 510 in each domain has asmaller vector value than other locations in the same domain, forming asmall pretilt angle and reducing a black afterimage.

On the other hand, the DBT 522 has a large vector value, increasing itslight transmittance. However, in the FFT region, light transmittancedoes not increase despite an increase in the pretilt angle. To bespecific, if the pretilt angle at the edge of the domain increases, moreliquid crystal molecules depend on the pretilt angle, and thus, thenumber of liquid crystal molecules affected by the fringe fieldincreases as well. As a result, the area of the FFT increases, and anarea 456 occurs where light transmittance decreases. On the other hand,in a part where no fringe field is formed, at the edge of each domain,an area 454 occurs where light transmittance increases due to theincrease in the pretilt angle of liquid crystal molecules.

In summary, owing to the process of using the unit masking pattern 810of FIG. 16A, a part of the edge of the unit pixel 400 decreases in lighttransmittance, while the other parts of the edge increase in lighttransmittance. Therefore, for the part where light transmittancedecreases, a structure of the unit pixel 400 may be changed.

FIG. 17A is a plan view of a first substrate of a unit pixel where aprojection is formed at an edge of a pixel electrode, on which an FFToccurs, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.Referring to FIG. 17A, a pixel electrode and opaque wires of the unitpixel overlap the FFT, improving the aperture ratio and lighttransmittance of the unit pixel. A unit pixel 400 of FIG. 17A has a gateline 410 and a data line 420, both of which are made of an opaquematerial, and a pixel electrode 500 made of a transparent material. Inparticular, on the pixel electrode 500 are formed a plurality of domains610, 620, 630 and 640, and FFTs 526.

The FFT 526 is partially formed at one edge of the pixel electrode 500.In other words, one edge of the pixel electrode 500 is divided into anFFT-formed region 528 and an FFT-unformed region 529. The FFT-formedregion 528 is proportional to a pretilt angle of an alignment film. Forexample, use of the unit masking pattern 810 in FIG. 16A may increasethe size of the FFT-formed region 528 and decrease light transmittanceof the unit pixel 400. However, since the FFT 526 may also be formedwith a low pretilt angle of the alignment film, it should be noted thatthe current embodiment of the present invention is not limited to a unitpixel that is manufactured using the unit masking pattern 810 with thefringe field region pattern 850, as shown in FIG. 16A.

The pixel electrode 500 of FIG. 17A has a projection 532 at the edge ofthe unit pixel 400 in an FFT-formed region 528. To be specific,according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention, projections532 may alternately project from circumferences of four domainsconstituting the rectangular pixel electrode 500. In other words, oneside of the pixel electrode 500 is divided into a part having theprojection 532 and a part having no projection. Since the pixelelectrode 500 has the projection 532, the unit pixel 400 is designedsuch that the FFT 526 located at the edge of the pixel electrode 500 islocated on the projection 532. In addition, a thin film transistor 430of the unit pixel 400 may be located on the projection 532.

The total area of the FFT 526 may be included in the projection 532.Since width of the FFT 526 is commonly measured as 60% of the DBT width,the projection 532 may project from the edge of the FFT-unformed region529 by 60% or more of the DBT width. For example, if a width of the DBTis 10 μm, a width of the projection 532 is about 61 μm or more.

The projection 532 of the pixel electrode 500 may be extended to overlapopaque electrodes of the unit pixel 400. For example, as shown in FIG.17A, a plurality of projections 532 may overlap the gate line 410 andthe data line 420. In the alternative, the projection 532 of the pixelelectrode 500 may selectively overlap any one of the gate line 410 andthe data line 420. Since the gate line 410 and the data line 420 areformed of an opaque metal, the FFT 526 does not reduce lighttransmittance of the unit pixel 400. If the projection 532 formed in theunit pixel 400 is set to overlap opaque films in this way, the reductionin light transmittance may be lessened with variously directed alignmentvectors of the unit pixel 400.

FIG. 17B is a cross-sectional view of the unit pixel 400 taken alongline XVII(b)-XVII(b)′ of FIG. 17A, which shows an example in which theprojection 532 of the pixel electrode 500 overlaps an FFT 526 and thedata line 420. Referring to FIG. 17B, on the first substrate 100 arestacked in sequence a first base substrate 110, a gate insulating layer412, the data line 420 made of a highly conductive opaque material, adata insulating layer 422, the pixel electrode 500 having the projection532 overlapping the data line 420, and a first alignment film 130.

The second substrate 200 of FIG. 17B has a second base substrate 210,color filters 250 made of a material emitting a basic color of the unitpixels, a black matrix 260, a common electrode 240, and a secondalignment film 230. The basic color of the color filters 250 may be anyone of the three primary colors of red, green and blue, or any one ofcyan, magenta and yellow. In the alternative, a color filter may be madeempty to have the color of the backlight assembly, passing through theempty space, but set as a basic color.

Between the color filters 250 is arranged the black matrix 260, and onthe color filters 250 and the black matrix 260 is arranged the commonelectrode 240 covering the entire surface of the second substrate 200.The second substrate 200 is fully covered with the common electrode 240,on which the second alignment film 230 having a specific pretilt angleis formed.

In FIG. 17B is shown an arrangement of liquid crystal molecules, whichdepend on both a fringe field 450 and pretilt angles of the first andsecond alignment films 130 and 230, in the middle of a liquid crystallayer 300. While liquid crystal molecules NLLC in the normal-luminanceregion 510 at the side XVIIb′ of FIG. 17B are affected by the pretiltangle of the second alignment film 230, liquid crystal molecules FFLC atthe edge of the pixel electrode 500 are affected by the fringe field 450and tilted opposite to the liquid crystal molecules NLLC of thenormal-luminance region 510. Therefore, FFT liquid crystal moleculesFFTX are aligned in parallel or perpendicular to the polarization axesof a liquid crystal display panel, causing a low-luminance textureregion.

An FFT 526 is situated on the projection 532 of the pixel electrode 500,which overlaps the data line 420 of the first substrate 100. The FFT 526is not observed in the unit pixel 400, since the data line 420 is madeof an opaque metal. The data line 420 is arranged outside thenormal-luminance region 510 of the unit pixel 400, improving theaperture ratio and light transmittance of the unit pixel 400.

In the alternative, the FFT 526 may be arranged to overlap the blackmatrix 260 of the second substrate 200. The black matrix 260 is made ofan opaque material such as an organic compound or a metal oxide andarranged between the color filters 250 to block light. Since the blackmatrix 260 is arranged outside the normal-luminance region 510 of theunit pixel 400 and the pixel electrode 500 has the projection 532overlapping the black matrix 260 and the FFT 526, the aperture ratio andlight transmittance of the unit pixel 400 are improved.

On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 17A, a single data line 420 orsingle black matrix 260 may be arranged in common with the pluralprojections 532 and 532′ of adjacent pixel electrodes 500 and 500′. Inother words, the data line 420 overlapping the projection 532 shown onthe line XVII(b)-XVII(b)′ of FIG. 17A overlaps the projection 532′ ofthe adjacent pixel electrode 500′ and the FFT 526′ located thereon,shown on line XVII(c)-XVII(c)′ of FIG. 17A.

FIG. 17C is a cross-sectional view of the unit pixel 400 taken along theline XVII(c)-XVII(c)′ of FIG. 17A, which shows an example in which theprojection 532′ and an FFT 526′ of the unit pixel 500 overlap the dataline 420 on the first substrate 100 and the black matrix 250 on thesecond substrate 200. Since a pretilt of the second alignment film 230in FIG. 17C has a direction opposite to that of FIG. 17B, liquid crystalmolecules are also all arranged in opposite directions. However, FIG.17C is the same as FIG. 17B in terms of the form in which the FFT 526′overlaps the data line 420 and the black matrix 260.

The data line 420 and the black matrix 260 in FIGS. 17B and 17C areextended straight along the edges of the pixel electrodes 500 and 500′.Therefore, the projections 532 and 532′ of the two adjacent pixelelectrodes 500 and 500′ are alternately arranged along the data line420. The straight extension of the data line 420 and the black matrix260 contributes to a simpler liquid crystal display panel design.

In the foregoing description, the FFT 526 overlaps the data line 420and/or the black matrix 260 using the projection 532 of the pixelelectrode 500. However, the projection 532 may overlap the gate line 410extending in a direction different from that of the data line 420, or astorage electrode 440 having a part partially overlapping the pixelelectrode 500, according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention. Unlike that shown in FIGS. 17A to 17C, the data line 420and/or the gate line 410 may be made in accord with the overall shape ofthe pixel electrode 500. In addition, it will be understood by those ofordinary skill in the art that the projection 532 of the pixel electrode500, which overlaps the opaque electrodes or black matrix of the unitpixel 400, may be formed all over one side of the pixel electrode 500.

FIG. 18 is a partial plan view of a unit pixel, showing a data line anda storage electrode of the unit pixel running along the edge of a pixelelectrode, and a black matrix, which is extended straight, according toan exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 18,a black matrix extending straight covers all of a projection of a unitpixel, other bent wires such as a data line, and an FFT, contributing tothe improvement of the aperture ratio and light transmittance of theunit pixel and a simpler design thereof.

On the unit pixel 400 of FIG. 18 are represented a storage electrode 440on a first substrate 100 and a black matrix 260 on a second substrate200. Referring to FIG. 18, the storage electrode 440 is formed such thata part thereof overlaps the edge of a pixel electrode 500. For thestorage electrode 440, its pixel potential is maintained for one frame.It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that thestorage electrode 440 partially overlaps the edge of the pixel electrode500, since excessive overlapping between the storage electrode 440 andthe pixel electrode 500 can reduce the aperture ratio and lighttransmittance of the unit pixel 400.

A data line 420 has a bending part similar in shape to the edges of thepixel electrodes, since it intervenes between two adjacent pixelelectrodes. Therefore, the data line 420 of the unit pixel 400 in FIG.18 has a bending part similar in shape to the pixel electrode 500 andthe storage electrode 440.

The unit pixel 400 of FIG. 18 has the black matrix 260 that is extendedstraight on the second substrate 200. The black matrix 260, which is aregion blocking the light, may overlap the wires, e.g., the gate line410, data line 420 or storage electrode 440 on the first substrate 100,and the FFT shifted to the projection 532 of the pixel electrode 500.Therefore, the unit pixel 400 may be less affected by the FFT,increasing the aperture ratio and light transmittance of the unit pixel400 and facilitating the simpler design of the unit pixel 400.

The projection 532 of the pixel electrode 500, which overlaps the FFT,may be applied to a unit pixel 400 having a plurality of pixelelectrodes. FIG. 19A is a partial plan view of a unit pixel including aplurality of pixel electrodes which have projections. Referring to FIG.19A, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, adata line 420 and a storage electrode 440 of a unit pixel 400 cross eachother in the vicinity of a region where a projection 532 and a recess534 of a pixel electrode 500 meet. Herein, the recess 534 may be a partwhich is connectively formed to a projection 532 on one side of thepixel electrode 500. Alternatively, the recess 534 may be anon-projection part on one side of the pixel electrode 500.

In the unit pixel 400 of FIG. 19A, two pixel electrodes 502 and 504 areconnected to one gate line 410 by two thin film transistors 430 and430′. The thin film transistors 430 and 430′ provide different voltagesto the pixel electrodes 502 and 504, since they are connected todifferent data lines 420 and 420′. Therefore, liquid crystal moleculeslocated on the pixel electrodes 502 and 504 are different inarrangement, making it possible to display a high-quality image that isnot deformed even when a liquid crystal display panel is viewed fromvarious directions.

In the alternative, the unit pixel 400 may have a transistor with twodrain electrodes and an additional capacitor for a voltage drop. Whileone drain electrode is directly connected to the first pixel electrode502, the other drain electrode is connected to the second pixelelectrode 504 by way of the capacitor for the voltage drop. Accordingly,it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the twopixel electrodes 502 and 504 may form slightly different pixelpotentials, improving the display quality of a liquid crystal displaypanel.

As described above, the pixel electrodes 500 are divided into the firstpixel electrode 502 for receiving a relatively high voltage and thesecond pixel electrode 504 for receiving a relatively low voltage. Thefirst and second pixel electrodes 502 and 504 have domains of differentalignment vectors, each of which has projections 532 overlapping FFTs.The projections 532 overlap the storage electrode 440 as well,preventing the aperture ratio and light transmittance of the pixelelectrodes 500 from deteriorating due to the FFTs.

The storage electrode 440 maintains a potential of the pixel electrode500 by overlapping the edge of the pixel electrode 500. However, thefull overlap of the storage electrode 440 with the pixel electrodes 500leads to the overlap of a normal-luminance region 510 of the pixelelectrode 500, causing a possible deterioration of the aperture ratioand light transmittance of the unit pixel 400. Thus, the storageelectrode 440 overlaps the projection 532 of the pixel electrode 500,but does not overlap the non-projection part 534.

The data lines 420 and 420′ are arranged along the edges of the pixelelectrodes 500, maintaining a constant distance from the pixelelectrodes 500 all over the unit pixel 400. On the other hand, thestorage electrode 440 has a part overlapping the pixel electrode 500 anda part separated from the pixel electrode 500. To be specific, accordingto an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the storageelectrode 440 is spaced apart from the recess 534 while crossing thedata lines 420 and 420′, in the region where the projection 532 and therecess 534 of the pixel electrode 500 meet each other.

The data line 420 may be arranged in the space where the recess 534 andthe storage electrode 440 are spaced apart from each other. In otherwords, in the vicinity of the recess 534 are arranged in sequence thepixel electrode 500, the data line 420 and the storage electrode 440. Onthe other hand, the data line 420 is arranged outside the storageelectrode 440, since the projection 532 partially overlaps the storageelectrode 440. In other words, in the vicinity of the projection 532 arearranged in sequence the pixel electrode 500, the storage electrode 440and the data line 420.

According to the above structure, a projection 442 of the storageelectrode 440, which overlaps the projection 532 of the pixel electrode500 or a part thereof, and a recess 444 of the storage electrode 440,which is spaced apart from the recess 534 adjacent to the projection 532of the pixel electrode 500, alternately cross a recess 424 and aprojection 422 of the data line 420, which maintains a constant distancewith the projection 532 and the recess 534 of the pixel electrode 500 onthe whole, thereby preventing an increase in size of the unit pixel 400.

The first substrate 100 of the above-described unit pixel 400 is dividedinto a pixel region through which light passes, and a non-transmissionregion through which light does not pass. Fine metal wires are formed inthe non-transmission region through which light does not pass, and onthe second substrate 200 is formed the black matrix 260 covering thenon-transmission region of the first substrate 100 since the displayquality of a liquid crystal display panel may decrease due to thediffraction or reflection of the light by the metal wires.

FIG. 19B is a plan view of a second substrate of a unit pixel, on whicha black matrix covering the non-transmission region of the unit pixel ona first substrate and a color filter representing a basic color of theunit pixel are formed. FIG. 19C is a plan view of a unit pixel obtainedby assembling the first substrate of FIG. 19A and the second substrateof FIG. 19B. Referring to FIG. 19B, the black matrix 260 covers thewires 410, 420, 430 and 440, and the FFT 526 formed on the firstsubstrate 100, surrounding the color filter 250. Referring to FIG. 19C,the unit pixel 400 displays a specific basic color as the light, whichhas passed through the first and second pixel electrodes 502 and 504 onthe first substrate 100, passes through the color filter 250 on thesecond substrate 200. By covering the FFTs of the unit pixel 400, theblack matrix 260 on the second substrate 200 may improve the displayquality of a liquid crystal display panel and increase the lighttransmittance thereof.

In a unit pixel to which a photo-alignment process according to anexemplary embodiment of the present invention is applied, a pretiltangle of a domain boundary region is set greater than that of anormal-luminance region to reduce black afterimages, thereby improvingthe display quality of a liquid crystal display panel employing the unitpixel. Because of this pretilt angle configuration, the aperture ratioand light transmittance of the unit pixel improve, contributing to anincrease in luminance and a reduction in power consumption. Further,since the unit pixel's storage electrodes and data lines may be arrangedto cross each other, the size and light transmittance of such a unitpixel having multiple pixel electrodes are improved.

As is apparent from the foregoing description, a pretilt angle of thedomain boundary region in each of the domains of a unit pixel can be setgreater than a pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region, increasingthe deviation between the arrangement of the liquid crystal molecules inthe domain boundary region and the polarization axes. As a result, thewidth and area of the DBT decrease and the aperture ratio and lighttransmittance of the unit pixel increase.

The pretilt angle of the normal-luminance region is smaller than thepretilt angle of the domain boundary region. Therefore, liquid crystalmolecules in the normal-luminance region depend on a pixel potentialprovided to the pixel electrode, reducing the black afterimagephenomenon. Hence, the liquid crystal display panel may have a furtherimproved display quality.

A projection of the pixel electrode of the unit pixel can also overlapwires or a black matrix near the pixel electrode and an FFT formed onthe projection may be hidden from the unit pixel, thereby improving theaperture ratio and light luminance of the unit pixel.

In addition, a shape of the black matrix and/or wires commonlyoverlapping the projections of adjacent pixel electrodes may not accordwith the external shape of the pixel electrodes, facilitating a simplerdesign of the unit pixel and preventing an increase in size of the unitpixel.

As for a unit masking pattern for forming the unit pixel, according toan exemplary embodiment of the present invention, since lighttransmittance of the domain boundary region is higher than that of thenormal-luminance region, a pretilt angle of the domain boundary regionis greater than that of the normal-luminance region, thereby reducingthe area and width of the DBT and improving the aperture ratio and lightluminance of the unit pixel.

The unit masking pattern includes three specific patterns different inshape: a non-irradiation part pattern, a normal-luminance regionpattern, and a domain boundary region pattern. Therefore, a unit pixelhaving a plurality of pretilt angles may be manufactured in a singleprocess, thereby simplifying the photo-alignment process and savingmanufacturing cost and time.

The pretilt angle of the domain boundary region is set large since afirst irradiation part of the domain boundary region pattern of the unitmasking pattern has no light blocking region. In addition, since asecond irradiation part has a triangular-shaped light blocking regionwhich gradually decreases in width, the pretilt angle of the domainboundary region adjacent to the normal-luminance region graduallyincreases, making it possible to stably control the alignment of liquidcrystal molecules.

While the present invention has been shown and described with referenceto exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilledin the art that various changes in form and details may be made thereinwithout departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention asdefined by the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A liquid crystal display panel, comprising: aunit pixel comprising: a pixel electrode formed on a first substrate, awiring pattern which is arranged around the pixel electrode on the firstsubstrate and is an electrode including an opaque material, and a commonelectrode which is formed on a second substrate, wherein the pixelelectrode has a projection in an edge region of the pixel electrode, onwhich a Fringe Field Texture (FFT) is located, and the projectionoverlaps the wiring pattern.
 2. The liquid crystal display panel ofclaim 1, wherein the pixel electrode is substantially rectangular inshape, one side of the pixel electrode has the projection and a recessformed connectively with the projection, and the projection is greaterthan about 6 μm wide.
 3. The liquid crystal display panel of claim 1,wherein the wiring pattern includes a storage electrode partiallyoverlapping an edge of the pixel electrode, and the projection overlapsthe storage electrode.
 4. The liquid crystal display panel of claim 1,wherein the wiring pattern includes a data line spaced apart from thepixel electrode, and the projection overlaps the data line.
 5. Theliquid crystal display panel of claim 1, wherein the wiring pattern ofthe unit pixel includes a storage electrode partially overlapping theprojection of the pixel electrode, and a data line spaced apart from anedge of the pixel electrode, and the pixel electrode has on one sidethereof the projection and a recess connectively formed with theprojection, and the data line and the storage electrode of the unitpixel cross each other near where the projection and the recess of thepixel electrode meet.
 6. The liquid crystal display panel of claim 5,wherein the second substrate further comprises a black matrix forblocking light incident upon a side of the second substrate opposite theside on which the common electrode is formed, and the black matrixcovers the projection of the pixel electrode, the storage electrode, andthe data line on the first substrate.
 7. A mask, comprising: a unitmasking pattern for forming pretilt angles in a unit pixel of a liquidcrystal display panel, the unit masking pattern comprising: asubstantially rectangular pattern, on which a non-irradiation partpattern, a domain boundary region pattern, and a normal-luminance regionpattern are disposed in sequence, the non-irradiation part patterncomprising a first light blocking region, which is located on one sideof the unit masking pattern and completely blocks light, thenormal-luminance region pattern comprising a first light transmissionregion and a second light blocking region, and having a normal-luminanceregion transmittance ratio, which is obtained by dividing an area of thefirst light transmission region by an area of the normal-luminanceregion pattern, the domain boundary region pattern comprising a secondlight transmission region and a third light blocking region, and havinga domain boundary region transmittance ratio, which is obtained bydividing an area of the second light transmission region by an area ofthe domain boundary region pattern, and the transmittance ratio of thedomain boundary region pattern is greater than the transmittance ratioof the normal-luminance region pattern.
 8. The mask of claim 7, whereinthe transmittance ratio of the normal-luminance region pattern rangesfrom 25% to 35%.
 9. The mask of claim 7, wherein the domain boundaryregion pattern has a first irradiation part and a second irradiationpart, which are adjacent to each other, the first irradiation part isincluded in the second light transmission region and light istransmitted through the entirety of the first irradiation part, and thesecond irradiation part is included in a third light transmissionregion, which includes the third light blocking region, and the firstirradiation part abuts the non-irradiation part pattern, and the secondirradiation part abuts the normal-luminance region pattern.
 10. The maskof claim 9, wherein the third light blocking region of the secondirradiation part has a light blocking length parallel to thenormal-luminance region pattern, and the light blocking length getsshorter as the third light blocking region is farther away from thenormal-luminance region pattern.
 11. The mask of claim 10, wherein thethird light blocking region of the second irradiation part is anisosceles triangle having a bottom side abutting the normal-luminanceregion pattern.
 12. The mask of claim 7, wherein the mask includes aplurality of the unit masking patterns repeatedly arranged in adjacentlines and is configured to be moved in a direction perpendicular to adirection in which the unit masking patterns are repeatedly arranged,such that the third light blocking region of the domain boundary regionpattern has a light blocking length in a direction parallel to adirection in which the mask moves, and the light blocking length islonger as the third light blocking region is closer to thenormal-luminance region pattern, and shorter as the third light blockingregion is closer to the first irradiation part.
 13. The mask of claim 7,wherein the domain boundary region pattern is about 5 μm or more wide.14. The mask of claim 13, wherein the domain boundary region pattern isabout 8 μm or less wide.
 15. The mask of claim 7, wherein the domainboundary region pattern is configured to provide first light energy overzero to a texture region of the unit pixel and the normal-luminanceregion pattern is configured to provide second light energy over zero toa normal-luminance region of the unit pixel, wherein the first andsecond light energies are different.